Category Archives: Ask Anthony

True modesty

Dear Anthony,

I am dating a woman I met on AMS that I am very attracted to. The problem is, I think I am lusting after her.  I don’t want to but I can’t help it.  She dresses in a way that I should probably have a problem with.  I like it and hate it at the same time.  Why is that?  And what should I do about it?  I am worried that I might not find her as attractive if she dressed differently.

I am very happy to see you struggle with this.  That shows that you have a desire for truth.  That’s good.

You are very vague about your dilemma, since you do not cite any examples about exactly how this woman dresses.  But I can guess what you are talking about.  I have had many men contact me about the struggle they have with the way the Catholic woman he is dating dresses.

Modesty is not so much about clothes as it is about intent.  It’s not so much what is worn, but how it is worn and the attitude that goes along with the presentation.

Don’t get me wrong.  Certain clothing is objectively immodest.  But for a woman to be immodest, she must be at risk of looking provocative.  So a woman who is not trying to be immodest, or believes that, in fact, she is not being immodest, can still be objectively immodest by the fact that certain clothing she is wearing presents her in a way that compels being noticed by men.

To lust after a woman is to desire her in a sexual, physical, and inappropriate way.  A man desiring to have sex with a woman he is simply looking at is, by definition, lust. It is a man’s responsibility to practice self-control and self-mastery in order to not be inclined to lust after a woman. Plenty of modestly dressed women are beautiful and desirable looking. A woman cannot be made to take full blame for a man desiring her.

Christian men are legitimately frustrated that they are exposed to women who are dressed provocatively.  Certain clothes on certain body types are going to be eye catching.  Women know this, and sorry to say, they have enough vanity at times to enjoy it.  It’s natural for a woman to want to be noticed and considered beautiful.  I highly doubt, however, that you can find a Christian woman who would say she is happy if a man lusts after her.

The dilemma is you have Christian women who live in a culture where they can get away with dressing all kinds of ways without knowing a fine line between modesty and immodesty, and men who have the problem you expressed; namely of loving it and hating it at the same time.  How can they not love seeing a girl dressed very noticeably?  (I refuse to use the word “hot,” but I’m sure many of you are thinking that is what I mean, and rightly so.)  But at the same time, he feels bad for being so seemingly shallow (or maybe he doesn’t think of that part at all).

The truth is, the clothes are not the only contributor, nor the worst of it.    Also contributing to the outward appearance is makeup and hair style.  And the worst of it is the attitude behind the appearance.

A woman may wear a dress that exposes her body, like a dress that is sleeveless, and shows her legs and knees.  How she does her hair and makeup, and how she conducts herself in that dress can make the difference between modesty and immodesty.  Even a woman in a pair of jeans and a long sleeve sweater can look provocative if she conducts herself in a manner that is meant to turn men’s heads.

I saw the movie “We Bought A Zoo,” which has the actress Scarlet Johansson in it.  She gets a lot of hype as being quite the gorgeous and sexy woman.  In this movie, however, she was hardly anything close to that.  She was not unattractive, but she surely was not sexy.  She was pretty, but surely not “wowing.”  Her character in “He’s Just Not That Into You” is totally about using her sex appeal to attract men.

The point is, a beautiful (even sexy) woman can successfully and quite easily conduct herself in a way which does not lure the eyes of men, nor stir their minds to impure or lustful thoughts.  In fact, a Christian woman should avoid doing any such thing.  They should be aware of what clothes they wear, and how their hairstyle and makeup combine with their clothes.  And they should definitely not have an intent to get noticed, via the way they walk, talk, or look at men.

All of these things contribute to immodesty.  It cannot be about how much flesh is showing.  How you conduct yourself publicly is also a contributor to immodesty.  

Perhaps it sounds like I am saying that Christian women should hide their beauty and dress frumpy and wear no makeup. On the contrary.  A pretty woman can be a pretty woman without flaunting herself.  Women must be honest with themselves about their vanity.  Many women have a strong temptation to vanity that leads to immodesty. True humility will allow a beautiful woman to admit her outward appeal potential and act accordingly in the name of the Lord.

Too many woman act in the name of themselves and tell others to just deal with it.  This is not a Christian attitude. Women must consider the effect they might have on men and be careful about their outward presentation and conduct.

A good Christian man does not want a woman he lusts after.  He might deceive himself in thinking he wants a “hot” woman. Those are not good Christian men.  What he wants is a modest woman who conducts herself in a manner befitting her faith, respectful of the one man who is the only man she wants to have admire her and have her in any sensual way.  She does not seek to purposely parade herself to the general male populace.  A man wants to know that she cares only that he desires her, not anyone else.

A woman can be modest and still look very classy and elegant, not trampy and seductive.  She can be beautiful without every man wanting her.  She can dress in clothing that compliments her body, without showing it off.  She can behave in all ways that show she is self confident in her looks, without assuming her looks are to be noticed and admired by all.

Modesty starts with the love of God and being thankful for how God made you.  It grows in an attitude of charity about how to present and conduct yourself.  Modesty in dating and courtship allows a woman to use her looks and charms to win the heart of one man, and is extremely careful to make him comfortable and secure that her looks are only for him.

If you are worried about how you lust after this woman you and are concerned that you might not be attracted to her if she dresses differently, then I am guessing you have a problem on your hands that might end the relationship if not addressed.  You can’t force her to change, but you can have a good conversation about modesty and share what you are experiencing by being with her.  Not matter how it ends up, communicating about such things is always the best approach.

I’ll be home for Christmas

Dear Anthony,

I’m getting married in June to the most wonderful man in the world! But we are having a disagreement about how to handle our last Christmas as a non-married couple. We can’t make it to both our families, but we cannot agree on whose family we should be with. I assumed he would want me to be with my family, but I was wrong. I feel guilty about considering going to my parents without him. What should I do?

Every year around Christmas time, I get asked by couples how they should handle Christmas. Some are not sure if they should introduce the person they are dating to their family at the Christmas Eve gathering. Some are concerned whose family they should travel to visit. Some are just so nervous about how their family will treat the person they are dating, or what the person they are dating will think of their family members.

Isn’t it amazing how at the time of year when we celebrate the coming of the Prince of Peace we can have so much anxiety?

On the surface, your problem seems to be deciding whose family you both should visit for the last Christmas before you are a married couple. But the underlying problem is more likely your decision that you are willing to visit your family without him and what will be the fallout of this decision.

First, it is important for you to accept that your desire to see your family for Christmas with or without your fiance is a natural one, and you should not feel guilty about that. Christmas is a very powerful time of year, and we are all strongly compelled to want to experience Christmas the way we are used to experiencing it. The thought of Christmas without visiting the family you have seen every year of your life seems an impossible thing to accept.

It is a very selfish thing to want to be home for the holidays, in the best sense of the word “selfish”. However, being selfish is not a very charitable thing to be, and Christmas should prompt us all to be the most charitable we have ever been. So perhaps there is a quiet guilt in both of you for feeling so selfish about your desires for Christmas.

It’s possible that either or both of you are secretly considering this some kind of a test to see if the other really loves you. I am smiling as I write that last line because it is funny how true it is that we all try to put someone we love to the test. In this case, you expect your fiance to concede to agreeing to visit your family.

That’s very romantic and chivalrous. But it is still an expectation, and when we expect something of someone, we set ourselves up for disappointment if they don’t come through. The fact is, he probably expects you to drop your notion of seeing your family and express how happy you are for you both to visit his family, and pass his test.

I think you should both share these hidden concerns and have a good laugh about them. One, it will put the truth on the table, which is always important if you are going to grow as a couple who shares the depths of each other, and two, it shows you both just how human you are, and being human is always funny.

From there, you can approach the problem head on because you don’t have to keep so much bottled up and assume things of the other. It’s important that you both share how much you want to go to your own family’s house for Christmas. Show each other that there is nothing wrong with feeling this way. It has nothing to do with not loving the other, but everything to do with loving your families. And what is wrong with that? Nothing!

Talk about the traditions you love from each other’s past Christmas’ growing up. Share what it means to each of you to be with your family.

Talk about how you can see yourselves handing the future Christmas’ as you both become your own family and have your own children and your own traditions. Talk about how you will deal with visiting your families, and how you might not be able to do that for too long as your family grows.

This is an opportunity to grow together as to what Christmas really means to each of you. No matter whose family you end up visiting, you will have done something so valuable for you as a couple that will prepare you better for marriage.

It’s also an opportunity to focus on the heart of Christmas, which is celebrated no matter where you are or whom you are with. It is imperative that you both see Christmas first and foremost about the coming of Christ in history but also in your own hearts and lives. Couples who fight and even break up over Christmas time are likely not living the spirit of Christmas in their own lives.

As a final thought, I would suggest you both consider agreeing to visit your own families separately. This is your last Christmas as a single person. And there is something to the concept of spending it one last time as you have always known it, because Christmas will never be the same again. You will soon be bonded as a family who can never be separated. It is something to think about.

Some couples will decide that they cannot spend Christmas without the other even at this stage, and that is completely understandable. But no couple should feel guilty about spending their last Christmas before marriage apart with their own families, unless it is done in disharmony. It has to be mutually agreed to, and you both have peace about it. Otherwise it is wrong for one of you to impose it.

I hope your Christmas is filled with every blessing in Christ, Who came to bring peace to those of good will who seek and desire peace. No matter what you decide, both of you should pledge as a gift to each other, as well as a gift to the Christ child, that you will always be a source of peace to each other, and renew that pledge every Christmas for the rest of your lives.

God bless you and Merry Christmas!

when siblings disagree with your choice of spouse

Dear Anthony,

I just got engaged to a great guy.  I love him a lot, but my sisters both think I am making a mistake.  It bothers me a lot that they don’t approve of him and I am afraid this is going to cause problems both now as well as after we are married.  Do you have any advice about this?

Getting marriage is a very personal thing.  It is something you both decide on for yourself no matter what anyone thinks.  However, it is also very public thing.  No marriage is a private matter because it happens within the context of community and society, and there are obligations each marriage has to the society, especially the society of family that is formed when children come along.

It is important that every couple think about how their relationship will affect others, especially future children.  This is not something that tends to happen when a couple is dating.  They naturally get caught up in themselves and what they mean to each other.  I don’t want to take away from this aspect of courtship because it is very much about the two persons that make up the couple, and others should not be allowed to have decision making power about their relationship.

I have had many people contact me regarding the involvement of their parents when it has come to whom they are dating, and how the parents concern affects how they think about the relationship with the person they are dating, not to mention the relationship with the parents.  Parents have a wisdom that can really be an asset to helping make a wise choice in marriage.  When someone has parents they respect and admire and trust, it is best to consider their opinion heavily.

However, parents should never make their child feel bad about whom they are dating or a decision about marriage to someone they are dating.  It is not the job of a parent to decide for their child, but rather to share their thoughts and/or be there for their child when they ask them for their opinion.  If done gently and kindly, and with a sense of respect for the child’s right to make their own decision, they can have a real influence for the good on that child.  If they know their child will do whatever they say, they also have the power to manipulate the situation, which would be wrong.  And of course, if they are angry and harsh about whom the child is dating, they can push that child into the arms of the very person they believe is no good for them.

This also applies to siblings.  But siblings are a little bit different.  They are more like your closest friends rather than authority figures and protectors like the parents.  I believe this is why it hurts even more when a sibling does not approve of your choice rather than a parent not approving.  Unless you are not close to your siblings, but I am assuming here we are talking about two sisters whom you are very close to.

The bond you have with your sisters makes it very important to you that they accept your choice of a spouse.  So it is completely understandable that you are bothered that they don’t approve of this man that you have agreed to marry.  I’m sure it makes you question if you have made the right decision or not.  In fact, you are probably already considering breaking off the engagement because both sisters whom you are so close with do not approve of him.

If you are considering this at any level, I would encourage you not to act on that.  You need some time to figure out what you are going through.  On one hand, you love this man that you clearly find to be a good man and the one you desire to spend the rest of your life with.  He seems to be everything you have ever wanted and cannot see living your life without him.  On the other hand, your sisters do not think he is the man for you.  Perhaps they see things in him that they feel are not good enough for their sister whom they love so much and want to protect.  They might fear this man will hurt you or fall short of your expectations.

Both of these considerations have pluses and minuses.  But in order to extract from both hands what is truth and good, you have to get past the emotional investment you have in your fiancé and your two sisters.  Staying at the emotional level will only cause you harm and might lead you to make a decision you will regret.  You love your fiancé and you love your sisters.  They all mean the world to you right now, so you are emotionally too close.

This is where you have to take a prudent and intellectual approach to the matter.  You have to take a step back from you affection for your sisters and take a pragmatic step forward.  You need to explore this with them, but the trick is not to allow anything you talk about to get to you.  Your sisters love you; they are not your enemy.  It is not your two sisters vs. your finance.  Remember that your sisters have your best interests at heart.

Having said that, you need to find out not only what they have a problem with, but what is behind what they have a problem with.  From my experience, too often a loved one (whether a sister, a parent, or even just a close friend) is jealous of the relationship itself.  They see that they are losing their close friend to this stranger who is perceived as an enemy.  They likely do not think this consciously.  But subconsciously, they might have ulterior motives for the things they say or the way they say them.

This is also very natural.  No one wants to lose someone they love.  Your sisters might feel this man is going to change your relationship with them.  And they are right!  He will.  But that is no reason for them to attempt to sabotage your relationship or make you feel bad.

So you need to have a serious talk with your sisters.  Ask them to share with you everything about your fiancé that they object to, and to explain why.  As they share this information with you, try and have some side comments to feel out what their motives are.  You might get to a point where you say “You know I love you both, right?  And that my getting married will never change the fact that we are sisters and the best of friends, right?”  Saying this could just reassure them and spark a peace in them that could change the way they think about him.

If they do start to come around, it should be primarily because they see how happy you are and how much you love him.  They need to realize that this is your choice, not theirs, and that it is you who are attracted to him, not them.

But you should also pay close attention to anything they observe about the two of you together that they feel is not right.  It does happen quite often that in our love for someone we are blind to things that could be considered red flags about the way you are being treated or that is unhealthy about you both as a couple.

 

 
To know about red flags, there is no one better than someone who knows you so well and loves you very much to point this out.  Your sisters might very well have some important observations that you need to know about and consider specifically because as your close friends, your sisters know things about you that are negative as well as positive, and they know you might be willing to ignore certain red flags because they know how you are.

There is a lot to consider.  I have given you just some food for thought.  Sit down with your sisters and have a heart to heart. And just be open without being too sensitive.  They only want to help because they love you so much.  But in the end, this is your choice and everyone has to accept that.  And they will.

your relationship deserves a good home (part II)

Home is the place where we feel safe, where we can shut out the world, enjoy the people we love and who love us, be accepted for who we are, and always go if something is wrong.

Home is the place where we grow into person we are called to be. Those whose home do not offer them these things will have all kinds of personal problems that disrupt their ability to develop.

Because it is a fundamental reality in every person to desire God, Who created us for Himself, and to be with Him, all pursuits of a home in this life are connected to the natural desire to seek God and can never be completely satisfied until we are in our eternal home in heaven with God.

We all want to be loved, which is to meet God in others. To be loved is to experience the Heart of Christ. All people deserve that home, that Heart, no matter what they have done.

The first call of the Christian is to love, to live that Heart of Christ, to be merciful. “What would Jesus do?” is sadly not a question we Christians are too anxious to seriously ask.

When it comes to dating and marital love, this is even more of a concern.

When you are falling in love, you are developing a dependency on the other for your happiness. It’s natural. The more you love someone, the more it hurts when they fail you. The law of love demands there be forgiveness if there is a sincere desire to be forgiven and of never doing something like that again.

If Jesus were sitting next to you, you would have no trouble disclosing every detail about what you did, and your regrets. Jesus, in all His mercy, would say something like, “It’s not beyond any human being to do such things” with the kindest voice, and in such a welcoming way. You would share what you did and ask forgiveness solely because you feel completely safe with him. The environment that Jesus provides is a safe, homey one. There is nothing that can happen that is unforgivable. His mercy endures forever.

We are also to provide such Jesus environments for others. Most especially it must be there for those we love. As you develop a relationship, and love grows strong and marriage becomes desired, that safe and homey environment should be present, cultivated, and well established. The more it is established, the safer the other feels about being themselves, sharing themselves, and even sharing their faults, weaknesses and sins. As they fall, they recover quickly because the mercy of the other is always there.

Now some cynical people might say this is a recipe for disaster because the other person will take advantage, knowing that mercy is waiting for them no matter what. This discounts the notion that justice for actions that must be tended to within any relationship, not too mention the emotional pain that needs healing. Though one might be merciful, they also can be hurt and must heal.

Starting with mercy is best because it says that no matter what has happened, we love each other and we are safe. We can get through anything. If the one who hurts you does not have a sense of that Jesus environment of mercy, they will have fear about what has happened. This fear can keep the person from doing what is necessary to remedy the problem, which can hurt the relationship.

How many of us have been in relationships where we felt we could not confess something we did, or fear disclosing parts or all of what happened? This is not normal in a healthy relationship. The Jesus environment is one of true friendship. True friends love each other regardless of what they do. When a true friend is wronged by us, their mercy is waiting. It might take time to re-establish the level of friendship and trust again, but they do not abandon you, physically or emotionally.

Being merciful is also incredibly attractive. It’s very hard to find people who will see you as Jesus sees you. People tend to first react with anger or some other negative reaction, instead of with mercy. This is very unattractive. When we do something wrong and that we regret, it is hard enough to face that within ourselves. When we have to face the one we love whom we have hurt, it is that much more terrifying. How incredible it is to have the first hurtful experience with the one you love be a merciful experience. They don’t react negatively. They don’t scream or cry or throw a fit. They don’t storm out.

Instead, they calmly look upon you as you share what you have done. Perhaps they first take your hand, or hug you, or softly speak. They first remind you that you are safe and home. They help you realize that nothing you have done is something they couldn’t have done as well, that you are not unforgivable, irredeemable, or unloved.

People do a lot of stupid things on dates. Most of it is out of bad habits they have developed. All of it is out weak human nature. It’s way too easy to pass judgment on others as you are dating, and way too convenient to say that this is not “the one.” And for many, it is entirely too difficult to trust those they date enough to cut them slack, give them a pass, be merciful. The risk of them taking advantage of you is too great.

Merciful we must be. We must cut them slack. We must give them a pass. We must make them feel safe and home so they can be themselves. We must work at friendship; true friendship. Love is kind and merciful. If you want love in your life, it must start with you.

When a person hurts you, consider what Jesus would do. And consider first that the only way for there to be real progress with the problem is if the person first feels safe enough with you to fail.

I can’t stress this enough. There are so many relationships where one or both live in fear of how the other will react if they screw up. What this means is there are way too many people seeking love who are not encountering the mercy of Jesus Christ in the person they are trying to get to know and grow in love with. Instead, their relationship is tainted by fears of what the other might do or say because of their shortcoming. What kind of relationship is that? Is that the kind of relationship we have with Jesus?

Our Lord told us that love casts out all fears. We are never afraid with Jesus because he is home; we feel safe with Him; we can tell Him anything and know that He will forgive us and share with us grace that helps us be better.

You most certainly are forgivable and redeemable. You are NOT your wrong doing and sins. You are a person. You have a right to feel safe enough to hurt the one you love, trusting in their mercy first, and prepared to fulfill justice in the situation second. You aren’t a terrible person because you feel too afraid to talk to the person you are in love with. A true friendship will naturally drawn out the desire to share everything as you feel safe and comfortable in that person’s love.

This is the essence of marital love. All single people need to practice providing the Jesus environment of mercy for those they date. It is the first priority for both of you, since married life is primarily about hurting each other and needing a safe, homey environment where forgiveness can be asked for and applied. If you fear talking to the person you are dating, or have experienced negative reactions as a result of trying to talk to them, and you don’t feel comfortable sharing your faults or wrong doings with that person, then there is a serious problem that must be remedied.

There are always going to be problems. Loved ones are going to fail you. Your first call in all situations is to be merciful, and to maintain a strong sense of the reality that only God can never let us down. In fact, expect failure in others and you will live more peacefully.

Dating someone unfit for marriage

Marriage is a practical sacrament and institution. It requires two people who not only “want” to be married, but are capable of living out marriage. Too often, people go into marriage full of love and good intention, but no personal skills to fulfill their role.

I continue to observe more and more how the capability aspect of getting married is not typically considered and is disconnected from the aspect of desire for marriage by two people. This disconnection explains why so many people, particularly Catholics, over-generalize and over-simply divorce as being evil and wrong, and believe everyone who takes marriage vows must never end that marriage.

The capacity for marriage must be taken into account, however, when it comes to any marriage. It is a fact that there are people who desire marriage that just should not get married, whether for temporary or permanent reasons of incapability.

The reality is marriages are ending in divorce in great numbers often because the persons who entered into them should not have ventured into marriage to begin with. And often times, one or both were actually unfit for marriage, thus incapable of living out that which they vowed.

We must never use this assumption as excuse not to continue trying, or to end the marriage. The sad truth is that someone’s incapacity for marriage is not easily recognizable before a marriage takes place. It is discovered after the fact.

I am pro-sacramental marriage and agree with the Catholic Church’s teachings on marriage and divorce. I have studied the subject extensively. There definitely are many marriages that end in divorce that shouldn’t, due to selfishness, lack of forgiveness, and a lack of endurance through difficult times which could be resolved through time, effort, and God’s assistance. To leave your spouse, for example, simply because you want somebody else, don’t feel love anymore, or because things aren’t as you expected, is inexcusable.

However, there are definitely divorces that happen that make perfect sense after careful examination due to one or both being incapable of making the commitment at that time the marriage took place, and perhaps having a permanent inability to live out marriage. Let’s look more closely at this.

First, it is worth pointing out that civil divorce today is not the same concept of divorce at the time of Jesus. Our divorce has to do with the civil agreement and civil law. In Jesus’ time, a divorce was related to the religious custom. Therefore, we cannot just dismiss modern divorce because Jesus was against divorce. That difference is for another discussion.

We must not get too caught up in a black and white notion of modern divorce in association with Biblical divorce. The Catholic Church does not recognize civil divorce. But it does acknowledge that it is possible that a sacramental marriage did not actually take place, thus issuing a decree of nullity regardless of the civil union. The Church will not even begin the annulment process unless there is a civil divorce, not because She wants to see a divorce, but because the civil divorce is the two individuals action of final effort to make it work.

What makes the sacramental marriage take place has EVERYTHING to do with both individuals not only exchanging free will consent, but being capable of giving their consent.

I read an article this week that quoted something I find disturbing. The person said that marriage is sometimes “analogous to an imprisonment” and those who suffer greatly in a marriage are meant to suffer as Christ suffered. Though marriage does often end up having levels of suffering that must be endured, a living condition of abuse or violence, for example, should not considered a noble Christ-like suffering to endure. It’s also not the most inspiring way to encourage young people to pursue marriage if they are sold on it as being an “imprisonment.”

People who are imprisoned want freedom. People on the outside don’t want to go to prison. So if there is any chance that imprisonment might accompany marriage, you can be sure people will stay clear of marriage all together.

The better approach is to see marriage as it is; namely, a vocation for two people fit to understand and execute the practical demands of a lifetime together creating a family that serves each other, enhances society, and glorifies God.

Too many have pursued marriage selfishly, brought children into the world irresponsibly, and have neglected their children by their disastrous parenting (or lack thereof). Children have a right to a mother and a father who raise them well and form them into quality people. The children will respond to and be formed by whatever the parents present.

Finally, too many terrible spouses have fashioned for the person they married an imprisonment they did not deserve nor should have ever been expected to endure. It is often the case that the spouse has no idea what they did wrong, nor have the ability to realize how harmful they are. This is very tragic, but it happens. And it happens because they are incapable of fulfilling what they entered into.

For many who are unfit, there is hope. With good help, effort, commitment to change, and God’s grace, they can turn things around for themselves and become equipped with the tools necessary to be a good spouse. They were capable of marital love but it was unrealized. Or perhaps they were young and foolish, and made an unwise decision to marry someone they were unevenly yoked with; who was not a suitable partner.

Sadly for some, they are deeply invested in the way they are and will never be able to be properly equipped or necessarily changed. They are incapable of marital love. They can live a very productive, fulfilling life in their work and among loved ones.

How to avoid marrying someone unfit? This is not easy, and sometimes cannot be known until after you get married and start living with that person. That is why it is very important to use your time well during the dating process and engagement period.

Learn about their background and upbringing, observe their relationships with their family members and friends (especially the relationship to their parents), ask lots of questions that pertain to the past and future, share and learn each other’s dreams, goals and interests. If there is anything that seems like a red flag, bring it up and see if you can get a satisfactory resolution. Don’t allow feelings of love to distract or blind you from what is important. Pray together and make sure you know that Jesus Christ is the most important person in each other’s lives.

Learn what is expected in marriage as husband and wife, as mother and father, and Christian persons living family life. Make sure you can observe the qualities, character, and actions in the other that prove the capability of living out marriage.

But don’t make this an interrogation nor be confrontational. You are trying to grow in love and depth with each other, not impose and insist. Allow the relationship to be natural while you both stay practical about the ability of your relationship to being lived out in marriage.

For those capable of a sacramental marriage, making the lifelong commitment in marriage is liberty and freedom at its best. Love is exchanged and lived out, even through all difficult times. It is not an imprisonment, which is forced upon you. It is more like Christ’s sacrifice of love, voluntarily laying down your life for the other.

Remember, you are dating and marrying a sinner. Everyone fails. How we respond to our failures and grow from them is what matters, especially when it comes to forgiveness. Those who are fit for marriage are truth seekers and acknowledge an authority outside of themselves.

Is your love life childish?

We’re like children, we’re not men! Classic line of a favorite Seinfeld episode I got to watch again the other day called “The Engagement.” I can’t help smiling even as I recall it to write this article.

Jerry and George are in the diner (as usual) whining to each other about their love life. George ended a relationship because the girl liked to say “Happy, Pappy?” to him. Jerry just broke up with someone because she shushed him. “I’ve got a real thing about shushing”, he tells George.

Then there is a “eureka” moment of disgust.

“What is this? What are we doing? What in God’s name are we doing?”
- “What?”
“Our lives! What kind of lives are these? We’re like children, we’re not men!”
-“No, we’re not. We’re not men.”
“Are we gonna be sitting here when we’re 60 like two idiots?”
- “We should be having dinner with our sons when we’re 60.”
“We’re pathetic, you know that?“ – “Yeah, like I don’t know that I’m pathetic!”
“Why can’t I be normal?”
- “Yes! Me too! I wanna be normal!”
“It would be nice to care about someone.”
- “Yes! Yes! Care!”

George then talks of remembering Susan, the serious girlfriend who worked at NBC, and how he liked her. He says “You thought she was good looking, right?”, to which Jerry asks why he should care what he thinks.

Then the really hilarious scene takes place between Jerry and Kramer. You have to watch this for yourself to appreciate it and get the full affect. Go ahead. I’ll wait.
- “Absolutely not! What are you thinking about, Jerry? Marriage? Family? ”
“Well…..”
- ”They’re prisons!!! Man-made prisons! You’re doin’ time!! You get up in the morning? She’s there! You go to sleep at night? She’s there! It’s like you gotta ask permission to use the bathroom. “Is it all right if I use the bathroom now?” 

What happens next is George shows up at Susan’s door and asks her to marry him, while Jerry breaks up with the latest woman he is seeing because she eats peas one at a time. George feels betrayed. He assumed Jerry was going to go right out and get married, too.

To wrap up, the rest of this episode shows George restrained from doing what he wants to do with Jerry because he is “stuck” with Susan or needing her permission. He is depressing himself because she wants to see a chick flick instead of the action movie with Jerry, because she asks if he is going to wear the shirt he is wearing out to the movies, and because he can’t watch the Yankee game Jerry called him all excited about because Susan wants to watch something else.

It is one of my favorite episodes of Seinfeld because it makes me laugh out loud every time, it’s brilliantly and insightfully written, and the delivery of the actors is remarkable. So what is my point in taking so much time to recall this episode? Hmm, I forgot. Oh, yes….the point Jerry makes that he and George are children, not men.

I believe the writers of this episode have it correct; that the love life of many singles is childish. There is often a grossly immature and unrealistic approach to the people we date, rather than a firmly grounded, mature one. That there is too much concern with the “now” rather than the future; with selfish preferences rather than an unselfish acceptance of another human being; with a need to find someone who will pleasure us at all times, rather than a desire to serve.

It is very much the occupation of a child to behave in the “now” with only a concern for the “now” and with only a desire to get what they want, when they want it. There is no concern for what anyone else might think or feel or want.

Taking a childish approach to your love life only leads to the same fate that any child experiences; namely, dissatisfaction and harm. If a child gets their way, they become a spoiled brat who must always have their way. Subsequently, they become adults of very little use to others, let alone to love and marriage.

As funny as this episode is, all of us know (sad to say) that there are people who actually DO break up with someone because of an expression that person has that bugs them, because they eat peas one at a time, or because they were shushed.

More to the point, we know that break ups happen because there is an unwillingness to accept the other person’s ways, quirks, etc, because finding someone who never annoys you and who is always pleasing to you is of such high priority, there isn’t a person alive who can ever get past the hyper-sensitive filter you have created.

Thus, the childish dater (one who is steeped in immaturity) refuses to recognize how difficult they, themselves, are to be around and live with, and how blessed they should feel that someone wants them despite their setbacks and issues. Like a child, they can only act on the impulses of self-pleasure and gratification, crippling them from ever having a healthy, mature, adult relationship with someone of the opposite sex that leads to authentic mutual love and respect, and marriage that desires to serve.

Kramer convinces Jerry that marriage is a prison, where you lose your freedom, your mobility, your autonomy, your very self. He hardly desires to serve, nor to have a relationship built on mutual respect and compromise. He does not see any joy in sharing a life with someone. It’s true that marriage requires this compromise, but when you are in love, it is not only a joy, it is personally fulfilling to share such a life.

Poor Jerry, George, Kramer and Elaine, as well as anyone else in real life who are like these characters at any level. I guess we know why these people are not married.

Jerry was right. “We’re like children, we’re not men.” He should have changed once and for all. Don’t make his mistake and remain childish. The love you seek demands you shed your immaturity.

Do men think smart girls are unattractive?

Dumb guys go for dumb girls, and smart guys go for dumb girls. So what do smart girls get? A cat!

That’s a little joke I have come across that’s pretty funny. Like all jokes, there’s an element of truth to it.

The first truth is that many smart guys do go for dumb girls. Whether they marry dumb girls or not is another question. But I have heard many women distressed about why these intelligent, devoutly religious men are attracted to what they call “air heads”. Well, needless to say, there is probably an objectively gorgeous woman carrying that air head.

But in fairness to smart men, there are plenty who do want a smart girl, and are actively seeking them. And they don’t choose the great looks over the quality brain (though undoubtedly they would like both).

Perhaps it would be better to identify this issue another way. I have heard the women express, “What are we supposed to do while we are waiting for men to figure out what they want?” Women feel like life could pass them by waiting for a man. They have a legitimate fear that if they configure their life in such a way, it will backfire on them.

Unfortunately, the person women become while they’re single and pursue a career can be unattractive to certain men. By certain, I am thinking about Catholic men who want a traditional role of provider, and hope to have a stay-at-home mother for their children.

Does that sound too old-fashioned and stereotypical? Maybe even shallow? Regardless, a serious Catholic man will not mind a smart woman, as long as she is smart enough to want to give up her career once children come along and stay home to raise them. That’s what they are thinking.

And this is where a HUGE misunderstanding occurs, and both men and women can mess things up. The fact is, smart, educated, intelligent, practicing Catholic women who are successful career women do want to give up their careers to stay home with their children and be homemakers!

But there is a catch, and a smart man would do well to display his intelligence by heeding this catch. Smart girls need proof that they are not being stupid to give up their careers. In other words, they are not going to just give up their life and their work for anyone who comes along with their charming smile, good looks, and empty promises.

A smart man should want a smart girl, and he should be smart enough to make every effort to provide her the enthusiasm, trust and security she needs in order to make such a drastic change in her life.

Many smart men are sadly too dumb to realize that these Catholic career women will happily give up their career to have a family. In fact, many of them are dying to do it. While they wait for a good man who will not be intimidated by her intelligence, level of education, and perhaps even that she makes more money than him, they become career single women with no incentive to be otherwise.

So they wait and they wait.

What are the advantages to having a smart woman as a wife? A smart woman can manage a home. She has been out in the world, paying rent or a mortgage, paying bills, budgeting, etc. She knows how to organize and be efficient with her time. Yes, perhaps she is a little obsessive, or penny pinching, or particular, but that’s all part of her charm. (But girls, it’s not good to overdue it in these management qualities, especially if you try to do so with the person of your man).

A woman who has experienced life before marriage is an interesting woman. Do not underestimate the importance of being with a woman who is interesting. Men who just want a woman who is uneducated, uninteresting, and simply capable of bearing him children and being at his beck and call is likely not going to respect that woman nor treat her well. Slaves don’t make for good companions.

So what are men really afraid of when it comes to smart girls? Well, they are intimidated by a woman who can hold their own. She causes him to face his own inadequacies. Just who she is convicts him of his lack of courage to be with a woman who is capable of being his equal, and who can challenge him to be the best man he is called to be.

The very things that intimidate them are the things men need. Marriage should be the love between a man and a woman who are good friends, who respect each other immensely, and who bring out the best in each other. Education and life experiences help develop a person into a balanced and interesting person. Men should not be afraid to make a woman like this his wife.

I believe men are concerned that smart women become too hard, too harsh, too unfeminine, too worldly. Well, perhaps some of them have and should work to reclaim her “feminity.” But there are many great Catholic women out there who are intelligent, educated, successful, and are still very feminine.

A woman will give the world to a man she knows loves her, respects her, and accepts her for who she is. When she sees a future with such a man, he will experience love like he could never imagine.

Smart girls, stay smart. Men who afraid to pursue you are not ready to receive what you have to give. They want the wrong things from you. Don’t give it to them, especially in the area of sexuality. But be careful not to assume the role of the male in relationships. A smart girl knows the man must be the man, and a woman must remain the woman.

Smart men, don’t be afraid or intimidated. Pursue a smart Catholic girl. Be confident that you are smart enough for her and capable of loving her as she needs. Don’t assume. She may be nothing like the stereotype. Make her feel comfortable about being an intelligent woman around you. Then enjoy the dynamic, exciting, and beautiful relationship that can develop with a smart girl.

Oh, and if she does have a cat, give it a pass and let her keep it.

For successful dating, love yourself.

In the Sunday reading of St. Paul this week, we heard how the proof of love is that we love our neighbor as ourselves.

Many people might be prone to use this passage in justifying their “I am who I am” approach to themselves. This is me! Take me for who I am! The ultimate love of self, therefore, is that we permit ourselves to be whoever we want to be and do whatever we want to do. After all, that’s “who I am.”

With this approach, the concept of love your neighbor as yourself becomes one of minding your own business. To love my neighbor would be to leave him be, because we would not want any neighbor attempting to question anything about us.

Sadly, many people actually dislike or hate themselves. They do not have a healthy sense of who they really are, their dignity, their self-worth, and their purpose. As a result, they are not able to take responsibility for themselves and their neighbor. They do not like themselves, which makes it impossible to truly love their neighbor.

This, of course, affects those who are dating in hopes of finding love, marriage and happiness. Instead of an ability to connect with someone who can be your equal, your close friend, your partner, there is more of an inclination to seek someone who will accept everything about you without question. Someone who can fill voids in a fragmented and distorted self that should be whole.

Every one of us are broken in some way, and sin daily. That comes with the territory of the human experience. But our fundamental dignity should compel us to desire to become a better person. We fall, but we get up and we ask forgiveness when necessary. We are weak, but God’s grace provides the strength to become who we are called to be.

That call is to be Christ. Baptism has configured us to Christ. We have a divine nature because of our Baptism. And that, fundamentally and truly, is who we are. We are Christ’s. We cannot say “I am who I am.” We must say “I am Christ’s.” That is our dignity. That is who we strive to be. Our unique personhood configured to the Person of Christ.

With this kind of love of self, we can love our neighbor as ourselves as we are called to. We are also able to offer anyone we date, and ultimately the one person we marry, a whole person who knows who they are, why they are here, where they are going, and what they are to do.

God willing, you find someone who also understands their dignity and loves themselves. Then, a couple is able to love each other without losing themselves, but with an openness to share in the person of the other.

When two become one flesh in marriage, it is a union of persons into one person, one life, one purpose; all without losing the individual self. Preserving your individual self is to preserve the person of Christ who is our identity, thus keeping us capable of the impossible; namely, the love of another person in the sacrament of matrimony.

I’m sure many of can look back on dating experiences and recall plenty of examples of people who didn’t love themselves enough to take care of themselves or be open to any changes that would better themselves and their ability to find a suitable partner in marriage. Hopefully, we can also recall times when we, ourselves, betrayed our own dignity by acting in ways that was a real turn off to those we dated.

The betrayal of our dignity, at whatever level and in whatever form it takes, diminishes our outward appeal and our inward life of grace. Thus we become uglier. Our life is a lie, of sorts, and we spend the days trying to fool others into believing we are something we are not.

How can we love our neighbor (or a spouse in marriage) if we cannot love ourselves enough to face Jesus Christ? He is who we are. If we are not Him, then who are we? We could be anything. Any pursuit of being ourselves on our own terms is to be nothing concrete and substantial and meaningful at all. That actually makes us dangerous.

Marriage is about becoming a help mate to another. It requires self-donation to the point of pursuing the other’s good before your own. The love of self is a love of Christ, who lives in us and through us. And His love life is service.

To love yourself is to serve to others. You give yourself away, and as a result, you become yourself. Love serves. Love of neighbor is service to them, not a demand that they accept you for who you are.

During the dating process, you need to see proof that the other loves themselves so much that they desire to give themselves away to you. And they must see the same from you.

If you harbor any dislike or hatred of yourself in any way, you have to seek help from someone who is capable of helping you discover these negatives and work on them. You must discover your self-worth in the light of the person of Jesus Christ. Live His life, a life of service, and by God’s grace you can overcome all problems with self-hatred. Above all, visit Jesus in the Blessed Sacrament often and talk about this. Ask Him to form you into the whole person He wants you to be. Ask Him to teach you how to love yourself and your neighbor, following His example.

Bring your best self to everyone you date. Your best self will be attentive to the other, while sharing all your faults as well as wonderful qualities, with the issues of your past as well as your efforts for the future. Being your true self that radiates Christ alive in you will be very attractive.

Should you observe a dislike of self in someone you are dating, including any ways they are abusive or harmful to themselves, encourage them that they have a dignity that makes them better than that, and that you would like to see it and share in it. Love them with enough kindness and patience that they trust you with their setbacks. Sometimes, a quality person who hates themself has never encountered an empathetic person. Regardless of whether dating the person leads to marital love, you will have at least helped this person to take a positive step toward self-worth.

Give yourself away in the name of Christ, who IS love, and you will become a vehicle of love to others.

Should we get engaged?

Dear Anthony,

My boyfriend and I have been good friends for the past 5 years and we just began dating a little over 8 months ago. We have a lot of deep conversations and we both feel that God is calling us to marriage. Do you have any specific questions or topics that we need to talk about before we take the next serious step and get engaged?

Assuming you are both practicing Catholics who adhere to all the Church teaches, your deep friendship grounded in your shared strong faith is going to get you through life together, regardless of any unrest. Here are some things I would suggest you consider that I believe are the only would be helpful as you move forward to the next big step:

1) Do you both understand the commitment to marriage being permanent, requiring fidelity to each other, and being open to children from the moment you marry? Are you practicing Catholics who live a sacramental life? Do you rely on God’s grace and know to call on the grace of the sacrament of marriage once entered into? Are you ready to give yourselves to each other with a full consent of the will and based on first understanding what is expected in marriage according to the Church?

2) Are you both committed to being chaste through your engagement (not giving in to pre-marital sex, which can only harm your relationship and take away from both of you the gift of your bodies which the Sacrament prompts)?

3) Are you firm about never using artificial contraception within your marriage, nor using NFP as a form of contraception? Being open to life is critical. Spacing children is permitted if there is grave reason to do so, and NFP can help with that, but using NFP for a reason like wanting time to get to know each other or you just don’t want any more children when there is no grave reason not to be open to it would be an abuse of the NFP opportunity.

4) Have you talked about raising the children? How you will discipline, educate, and guide them? It is important to be on the same page about these things, but also flexible if life should deal you a hand you did not expect.

5) Do you both know how to forgive and ask forgiveness? You will spend a lot of time unwillingly hurting each other during marriage. It helps to marry someone who knows how to ask forgiveness as well as forgive. Too many marriages are laced with prideful people who don’t ever want to be wrong and must blame the other for everything.

6) Do both display proof that your love is grounded in service of the other? Do you tend to each other’s weaknesses and needs and see each other’s happiness over your own? Mutual love through service can get you through any trials, as well as help your love grow stronger. You are going to have your moments of weakness and need, and it is up to the other to be strong for the other’s sake at those times. Also, both of you are inclined to selfishness by fallen human nature, so love for each other and the children that come in marriage is the path to sanctity that is a selfless life. You will both inevitably have selfish moments that threaten the peace, so it is up to the other to bear those moments well, and help the other come out of that selfish moment through gentleness and kindness, as well as firm requests for the higher good. Dating and engagement should be a time of seeing these qualities in action. However you are together now will be carried over into the marriage. So make sure you have plenty of opportunities to be challenged to love each other in selfless service.

7) Do you both have God and His Church as your point of reference for what you believe and how you live your life? This is tremendously important when it comes to resolving problems. Having God and the Church as the authority allows both partners to help identify what is right and wrong about the situation and in the actions of each, and help to know who should be sorry for what. But keep in mind that it is always a call to heroic virtue in marriage to admit you are wrong when you are not, for the sake of the other who might be too crippled in the moment to admit they are wrong. That is an act of charity on your part, and charity is always the highest form of living true love for another. Resolve the situation later, make the peace now. But do resolve it. You are not a doormat for the other to take advantage of because you are so generous and kind and charitable. Marriages requires both to be working on themselves in order for it to be a success. One doing all the work is just a bad marriage that is being endured, specifically by the one must do what they have to do.

8) Are you both on the same page about finances and your standard of living? Many go through financial crisis during marriage and it ends in divorce, not because being in financial crisis is so bad for marriage but because one or both do not cling to each other through the difficulties, nor trust in God to provide. Living a spirit of poverty even if you are affluent is important for both of you as well. Do either of you show signs of greed or desire for money or material things? It is fine to pursue material things in perspective, but not as a priority of life. Nothing should come between you, especially money. So right now, whatever your individual income, careers, debt, school loans, spending habits, etc., you both have to come to terms with these things together and consider the future scenarios. You don’t want any surprises about how either of you factor in finances, if you can help it. Getting through the ups and downs of your way of life and financial situation together, without undo pressure on each other, is important. Helping the other in moments of weakness when they worry about money or job situation, etc., rather than making things worse by blaming or worrying, is also important.

9) Have you talked about your roles in marriage as a man and a woman, as a husband and a wife, as a father and a mother? There are definitely roles and duties in marriage that love demands we fulfill. To not be aware of them or define them together would be a big risk as you get married and just hope all will fall into place. Do not assume. Make sure you are both comfortable with each other’s understanding of what you should both be doing or be willing to do, or not do for that matter. Problems with assuming the other has been a great cause of marital unrest and discord. Don’t let your wonderful feelings of love keep you from talking about what your roles and duties will be.

These are wonderful things to have in place. But ultimately, it is the acknowledgement of God as your authority and relying on His grace that will get through, even when there are things not quite in place or still seem uncertain.

Two people who love each other with a mutual respect and a deep friendship are difficult to discourage from moving to the next step. These things are important things to talk about and work on. If you are both willing to seek truth and work on faults and accept each other, you have so much in place that make you ready for the next step.

Can I afford to date?

Dear Anthony,

I only make $35,000, and the woman I just started dating makes about the same. It’s hard for me to find work that pays more. I want to fall in love and marry one day and provide for the family. Should I feel guilty about dating? How do you date someone when you both have very little money? This is even more challenging if you are trying to fly or drive to meet someone in another state or country.

It is a very difficult financial time. It’s easy to be distracted by financial set backs when it comes to marriage.

We live at a time when people must get creative about how they go on dates. Men have to know how to take a woman out for an enjoyable time that is not costly, without looking like a cheapskate, or making the woman feel like she should help pay. Women have to be open and help the man feel good about his inexpensive date ideas.

The dating period is an important time to discover the character and quality of each other. Those who have particular expectations and tastes when it comes to what they do on a date will display their standard of living preference and their tolerance for financial uncertainty pretty early on.

For men who don’t have what is known as a “living wage,” establishing a single-income family is going to be challenging. Finding a woman who can be content with a lower standard of living and find happiness in a life of love with you and her children is important if your earning potential is not likely to change dramatically. Perhaps she will be able to help out financially if she chooses and if it does not interfere with her role as mother and homemaker. If there are desperate times, it helps to have a woman who joyfully does whatever is necessary to help the family financially. Hopefully the woman you are dating is showing this kind of character and willingness.

Another consideration is that financial issues are in the top three reasons for most divorces in this country. Whether they were not on the same page about money or whether they let the pressures of financial trials destroy their relationship, it is important to realize just how powerful finances are in a relationship.

I know a couple who dated for a year before they were married. They both made very little money and lived in different states, about a 3 hour drive apart. Each weekend he drove to her and was able to stay in a spare room at her employer’s house. For their dates, they would find places where they could talk and not spend much money (a park, a coffee shop, etc). The first year of their marriage, they lived on a salary of $20,000, had a very small one bedroom apartment, and had one beat up old car to share. They struggled, but they were together on living the struggle and doing what was necessary.

Many people would determine that this couple who can barely make ends meet can’t afford children. But they began having children right away. And wouldn’t you know that with each child came a financial blessing of some kind, usually in the form of a better job opportunity for the husband, and a better home for the growing family.

This couple were people of prayer and faith. Their dating life was centered on their Catholic Faith and their trust in God, both as individuals and as a couple for the future. Their marriage was entered into with trustful surrender to God’s will. They believed that being open to life as the start of their marriage would mean God would bless them in turn with providing for that growing family. Did they pray for riches and expect that God would give them a standard of living society was dictating? No! They were content to be poor and struggle all of their married days. They only expected God to provide for the needs of the family.

The needs. That is where the breakdown begins for many people. What is a true “need” and what is just our desires? Too many people want to live the higher material life that they see all around them, and will not accept a life of poverty. Too many people don’t want to get married or have children because they believe they must make a certain amount of money in their job, or have a certain amount of money saved, or have no debts or creditors, etc. They want to be financially secure and independent before they will commit to marriage. They want to know they can achieve a standard of living they have erroneously come to believe is the standard of living that makes for an appropriate life for a family.

This blindness to what true needs are and ability to accept a life of poverty if necessary stems from the greatest problem of all; lack of faith. The couple who lives humbly on a meager single income has a strong faith in God as Father and truest provider, and has a firm trust that He will provide as they step out in faith to make commitments like marriage and having children. The people who fear making such commitments put their trust and faith in money; more specifically in themselves and their own ability to make enough money to afford marriage and children.

The focus on money makes people incapable of coming to a place where they finally say, “I have enough money and I’m ready to make a commitment.” There is seemingly never enough money to afford getting married. When you think about having a big enough house, two cars, having money for college, etc., your mind explodes with the “reality” that you cannot afford such a life.

There is no shame in choosing to accept living without the luxury items of life that seem to be necessities. If you can make more money to afford to do more expensive things on dates, or to provide for your family more things like vacations, big screen TVs, iPods, dancing lessons, paying for college, etc, then wonderful. A man should not stop trying to improve his financial circumstances wherever possible (i.e., finishing college, looking out for better job opportunities, etc). He does have a moral obligation to do this. But that does not mean that more income should translate into having more material things. Saving money as you make more money while still maintaining a simple life is noble too.

Whatever a couple decides about their financial choices, there is nothing wrong with dating and being open to love and marriage while you don’t make much money. Are you a good man capable of loving and serving a good woman in every way God expects you to? Is she a good woman capable of the same? Do you both have a profound faith and trust in God to provide as you make life decisions? Then truly, that kind of love can get you through anything life deals you, because God will be your Father and He will provide.

Is it okay to date multiple people?

Dear Anthony,

There are three women I have developed an interest in on AMS. I know I should form friendships first, but I’m starting to feel guilty about communicating with multiple people. How can I sensitively slow down communication with two of them while I am concentrating on the one I have the most in common with?

You are bringing up two specific issues. First, there is the issue of whether or not it is okay to communicate online with three people. Second, there is the question of how to tell two of them you want to concentrate on someone else.

Taking the first, there certainly is nothing wrong with being in communication with three people at the same time. Dialogue with several people does help to determine who you would like to pursue.

The things to consider are what you are saying. Hopefully, you are not telling each of these women that they are the most beautiful girl you have ever seen. That would be an inappropriate way to dialogue with several people. Friendly exchanges that seek to share some general things and get to learn more about the other is more productive. That way no one can claim that you were leading them on. (Of course, some people see things as they want to see them, and might mistake any message at all as an indication that you want to seriously date that person. No much you can do about that.)

An online dating site like AMS can have the assumption associated that everyone on the site is looking for love and marriage. That might be true, but it is a distorted view of online dating to write only to those you want a serious relationship with. Therefore, no one should assume an initial contact, or subsequent dialogue means there is something serious developing. I don’t think anyone should feel guilty about having friendly exchanges with several people. If you have the time to keep up, and the courtesy to respond, then it is a very productive way to use online dating to determine if there is anyone you are serious about pursuing.

It sounds like you have gotten to that point of determining of person you wish to exclusively put your time into getting to know more. Hopefully, you will be talking to her about meeting in person and not just continuing electronic communication exchange. And now that this is the one person you wish to focus on, you are not sure how to tell the other two.

You mentioned you want to “slow down” communication. Does that mean you still want to be interacting with these two ladies while you pursue the third just in case it might not work out with the third one you are more interested in? If so, that’s a tough one. Obviously, it makes some sort of sense to not want to burn any bridges so you can be open to one of the other two in case gal #3 hits a dead end. But is this the right thing to do? It sounds like leading on to me. That’s probably where your guilty feeling is coming from.

Your best approach would be to be honest with the other two. Tell them you have enjoyed getting to know them but want them to know you are spending more time talking to one certain person and don’t feel comfortable continuing the dialogue with them unless they are okay with it. You could even ask their permission to continue writing just to keep in touch and respect whatever decision they make about that. But definitely contact either one of them again if it does not work out with the women you chose to focus on.

Dating sites tend to give you a lot of information about a person. You might feel like you “know” more about them than you would if you met in person somewhere. But the fact is you don’t really “know” them yet at all. You have information only. So it is best that we treat contacting members online as a networking effort, rather than some form of dating.

Since online dating sites are actually networking environments, everyone is entertaining multiple contacts. So there is no reason to feel guilty. Writing a careful and considerate initial message based off of what you read on their profile is a normal networking exercise. Only writing to as many as you can keep up with is prudent.

Again, honesty is best. In your case of writing to three women at the same time, it would have been a good idea to let them know that you are writing to more than one member currently. Also let them know that you will not be seeking any further contacts, nor accepting further contacts, as you discern these current possibilities. Probably their reactions to this fact will help them (and you) determine if this is a relationship that is going to progress further.

It’s helpful to think of dating online on the same lines as dating offline. If you’d taken a girl out for coffee, enjoyed it, and then met another girl out at a picnic, would you feel guilty about striking up a conversation? Probably not. It’s only conversation. And let’s face it, you are not engaged to someone you took on a date for coffee. So it is with communication online. It’s just conversation. But I will reiterate that we have to be careful what we say, because it is NOT “just” conversation if you are saying things to more than one woman that elude to strong interest or intentions.

It might seem like I have gotten off topic, but cutting off people you dialogue with in order to focus on one person has everything to do with an attempt to get serious. And it is very important that meeting in person not get prolonged too much.

If you follow my blog then you know that I believe there shouldn’t be too much time between speaking on the phone and meeting in person. So you should focus on the woman you’ve spoken with for a little while, and see if there is interest on both your parts in meeting. If not, that’s a sign that you are not in the right place. If so, you will probably be able to determine rather quickly if this relationship is going to continue to grow. If you have any hope at all of being able to communicate again with one of the two you let go of in order to pursue the third gal you determined is not for you, you will need it to be sooner rather than later.

I think you have everything in order in your situation. It’s great that you have a healthy guilt about talking to more than one woman. But I hope you realize now that you are not dating three women in this circumstance, just networking and being friendly. And I think your desire to slow things down or cut it off with the other two is admirable. I’m sure you will find the right words for the two women you want to slow things down with.

Taking a break from a relationship

Dear Anthony,

I just got engaged and recently I’m thinking I need to take a break from our relationship because I am struggling with him and need to determine God’s will. I really want to make sure I am doing what God wants of me.

I assume your struggle is whether or not to proceed with the marriage? Taking a break is for those who are dating, not engaged. Engagement is a different story. The concept of taking a break cannot be considered a normal thing during an engagement period.

While dating someone, it can happen that you have developed a strong friendship and you like each other, and can see love is developing, but you feel unsure if this relationship should progress to a more exclusive stage. Taking a break from dating can be an effective way to decide.

The result most desire from the take-a-break concept is that the one who needed the break realizes that they miss the other and finds that life is not the same without the other in their life. That naturally causes certitude of the heart and a peace about getting back together and getting more serious.

Love between a man and woman should produce great clarity about the direction of their relationship and their lives. Just because we have fears doesn’t mean there is not love. Too often great relationships are wounded or broken due to the inability of one or both to get past their own self-imposed issues.

What really happens is they are afraid of love. Love demands and requires everything. Giving up anything, for some people, is too unreasonable or difficult. Thus, the relationship stagnates because one or both cannot keep letting go of selfishness.

I’m concerned that you mentioned the need to discern God’s will in this. I am all for God’s will, but too often I hear single people use God as an excuse for what is the real reason for their situation; namely, their own fears or indecision. God loves decision-makers, and He is always waiting to bless couples as they make commitment moves in their relationships.

At each stage of a relationship, it is the two individuals making decision. God is there to bless them and provide graces to strengthen the path. To stop the process and say “I have to discern” can too often be an easy cop out for our own inabilities to proceed. It’s not God at all who has anything to do with it.

Be careful about over discerning. God is always where peace is consistently. I often tell people that the devil shakes in the moment, and God holds us over time. Meaning, we make bad decisions when we are in the middle of unrest and chaos of situations, events and emotions. God lays peace on our hearts over time.

Love is tested over time. One of the greatest ways to acknowledge you are in love is when you come to realize that you cannot imagine living the rest of your life without this person. That is the conviction you want to have going into a serious relationship.

For someone who is engaged and trying to determine if you should proceed with setting a wedding date, a short break could help settle things down, but I emphasis the word “short.” A week or two is sufficient.

Sometimes people get cold feet. But sometimes people fear that they may be making a fatal mistake. This can still just be nerves. Stopping with the wedding plans and taking some time apart can help clear the mind and restore the peace. Say that you need to take a little time to yourself to clear your mind and settle your heart so you can proceed in the best state of mind possible.

It does not take long to know if you should proceed or not. If you need longer than 2 weeks, than the engagement should be called off and take as much time as you need. Don’t date, don’t talk to each other. Hopefully, your fiance, who does not want a break, will be understanding.

If you determine that you can’t proceed, then you have an obligation to not go forward with it. I know that sounds obvious, but you would be surprised how many people still proceed out of guilt or some sense of obligation. Marriage is too sacred of an institution to be treated disrespectfully and entered into without firm consent of the will of both parties. Endure the fallout of calling it off, and then move forward. Hopefully, it will not come to that. It is more likely that you are overwhelmed, and the prospect of this big step and change in your life is imploding on you.

Pray to Jesus in the Blessed Sacrament and hear Him asking you this question: “Are you prepared to live without him for the rest of your life?” Let the Holy Spirit lay peace on your heart a “yes” or a “no”. Then proceed with faith in the direction where the peace lies.

Let’s (not) spend the night together

Dear Anthony,

I am in a long-distance relationship and it’s my turn to visit him. He offered to put me up in his guest room. I know we are both committed to staying chaste, but I wonder if this is the right thing to do.

Thank you for writing about this. The Rolling Stones sang, “Let’s spend the night together” for two people feeling drawn to each other. But the better advice is let’s NOT spend the night together, for the same reason. Two people drawn to each other in the normal, beautiful ways God has created love between a man and woman need proceed with caution and mutual respect for the realities of attraction.

Long distance relationships are part of the reality of online dating. And having to make these kinds of decisions are also part of it. Leading a moral life, both in practice and appearance, requires making the tough decisions as well. To have a successful long distance relationship takes a lot of faith, courage and determination. It is so easy to get discouraged because of the often challenging hurdles to overcome just to make the necessary “in person” time together.

To succeed at a long distance relationship takes heroic virtue. Your question represents a very common situation to have to deal with; namely, where to stay when one person is visiting the other. And when both have openly committed to staying chaste, as you have mentioned, then it seems it would be okay to entertain certain lodging options that would otherwise be an obvious impossibility under the normal rules of chaste dating.

You are basically asking if the two of you can spend the night together under the same roof. The guest rooms seems to offer a suitable protection. But there is no question that you must not stay overnight in his home and arrange to stay at a hotel. Perhaps if he did not live alone and had a roommate or lived with his parents who would be there, you could consider it more seriously. But his home where he lives alone is highly discouraged. Maybe he has family you can stay with during your visit. There can hardly be a good excuse for staying in a guest room of a man who lives alone. Saving money on a hotel is not as important as saving your virtue.

I would further advise that it is prudent to not be alone with this man in his own place. We have to take care of all practical things regarding avoiding the near occasions of sin as we have learned as Catholics.

I realize that there might be an age and maturity factor involved here. It might be you are both older single Catholics, much more mature and in control of your emotions and feelings. And you may have already discovered that you both are respectful, and he is a gentleman, etc. Therefore, it probably seems much more reasonable for you to consider staying at his place, and he does not think it inappropriate to invite you stay there. It might even be there are financial matters that prompt this and make it also seem practical and doable. Finally, it might be you both are seriously going to see to it that nothing happens and preserve your chastity.

I will tell you this. From my long experience dealing with single men and women, sins of the flesh are something every person is capable of, not matter how unlikely it seems. You would be surprised what anyone, even yourself, is capable of under the right circumstances.

I’m sure you trust this man, and he is well intentioned. But it is a matter of propriety and prudence that you not be alone together in a place that would allow for any unchaste temptations. Staying over night at his apartment is definitely out. Spending the evening at his apartment is also not so wise.

I would advise against it, though others might argue differently. Only the two of you can decide that for yourself. But I still say ask a good priest or your spiritual directors about it.

Your boyfriend should be the one to pay for your hotel room. And it is only right to respect the attraction you have toward each other, and fallen human nature itself, by not allowing either of you to be in a near occasion of sin. It might sound corny or outdated, but he shows a greater respect for you to protect your honor in such ways. If he does not like it but will respect your wishes, then that’s fine too. At the very least, you have to be the one to protect your own honor.

Too many people do not think about what something “looks like” today. Just because nothing is going on between you two does not mean it is okay to allow yourselves to be in situations that don’t look good, or give the wrong impression. Impressions do count. Preserving reputations count. We are witness of Christ to others, and we therefore must be a good example. We are not permitted to do our own thing and be our own authority as to what is right and what is wrong. We are also not permitted to thumb our nose at others and not care what they think, at least to some degree. This degree applies. When it comes to pre-marital relationships, we have to be good examples.

Yes, you can always say “Nothing happened.” But why set yourself up for that if it can be helped. Sometimes it’s unavoidable, and there is nothing you can do about that. However, in cases like this, it most certainly can be helped.

I hope this helps.

Yours in Christ,

Anthony

What NOT to do on a first date

Few experiences in life can be more nerve wracking than going on a first date. There is great anticipation. You’re excited. You’re nervous. You’re not sure what to expect.

In many years working with single Catholics, I have been privy to hearing about thousands of first date experiences. So I have learned a thing or two about what you should or should not do on a first date. What to do is the easy part. Be friendly, be courteous, be considerate, be open-minded, and mind your manners. And be yourself!

What not to do is the harder part. It’s harder primarily because what you should not do is subjective. The fact is there are some objective things you just should not do on a first date. You might disagree, but the following DON’TS come from many first date horror stories.

Don’t be late
To be early is to be on time. Being late starts things off on the wrong foot and sends an unfortunate initial negative message. Show respect for your date by not running late. If you’re running late, have the courtesy to call. And don’t give a lame excuse. Just own it and be honest. You will be respected more.

Don’t dress down
Put some effort into your appearance. Being too casual can come across as being lazy or like you just don’t care either way. You want come across like this is an important event. Look nice and well groomed. Get a haircut, look up-to-date in styles, without being flashy or trashy. There are settings for dressing down, but don’t make the first date be one of them.

Don’t use your phone
For goodness sake, put the phone away. You want this person to know you want to be with him or her. Leaving the phone on the table is tacky. Looking at the phone or checking for messages is ridiculous. The phone ringing while you are conversing with this person is annoying. Taking a call while on the date is a deal breaker. Sure there are emergencies. This is understandable. But make sure you tell the person immediately upon the introductions that you have a phone and what you intend to do with it during this date if it is really that important.

Don’t scope another person
To state the obvious, when you are on a date, don’t look at other members of the opposite sex as they walk by. It’s hurtful and embarrassing. Can there be anything more damaging to making a person feel unique or special?

Don’t be too serious
Relax and have fun. Show you have a good sense of humor. Laugh. If you are too serious and trying too hard, it will show and it can make for an unpleasant evening. Keep it light and just enjoy each other. Don’t get obnoxious or try to be too funny. Be balanced. Everyone wants someone with a good sense of humor. So be yourself and make each other laugh and feel at ease.

Don’t be too independent
Nothing wrong with being old fashioned. Gentlemen, hold the door for the ladies. And ladies, graciously accept this kind offer. Guys, ask permission to say or do something. She will feel respected. Ladies, ask him to help you with something. He will feel useful. If this all sounds so outdated and ridiculous, I will ask you to show me the statistics that modern dating independent behavior and methods have proven more successful.

Don’t do all the talking
Dating is about dialogues, not monologues. Someone who talks to much comes across self-centered. It’s very unattractive. Show that you are interested in hearing what your date has to say or in learning more about them but keeping your commentary short, and asking questions. If you are not a talker, you can’t just sit there and wait for the other to come up with all the topics. Too much dead air is uncomfortable. Be ready to share and initiate, as well as respond.

Don’t over do it
No excessive drinking of alcohol, flirting, sharing, etc. You don’t want to get too tipsy or drunk, which will make you do things you will regret. You don’t want to come across as too forward by flirting too much. And there is no need dump on this poor person all about your life story or your past relationship woes. It’s too much too soon. Keep everything in balance and respectable.

Don’t let the girl pay
I know there is much disagreement on this, as discussed before, but the man should pay on the date. Ask her out, take her out, and pay her way. It’s classy and it’s impressive. Don’t allow for any awkward moment that she would even have to wonder if she should pay, or offer to. Going dutch is never smooth. When the check comes, guys, just reach over and take control of it. She will love it and feel very special.

Don’t touch the merchandise
Touching in any way is unnecessary on a first date. So no holding hands nor kissing on the lips. Touching another person is a very intimate thing. You are far from sharing intimacy, so don’t touch. Build the anticipation of a first kiss over time. There is a right moment for it, and it’s much more romantic to build toward it than for it to just “happen” at the end of the first date.

Don’t tempt
You might think you are mature and above such things as being concerned with the near occasion of sin, but you would be mistaken. Sexual attraction is the most natural thing about being in a relationship with the opposite sex. Being alone with this person in a place that can allow for sexual temptations to be submitted to is imprudent. So don’t go back to his or her apartment and be alone. I know you “know” nothing will happen, but it just might. And besides, it does not look good and it does not show respect to the person you are dating.

Don’t get married
Maybe I am exaggerating. But you would be surprised how many people are trying to figure out if this is the person they are going to marry while on their first date. That’s counterproductive. It’s not an interview, and it does not have to be love at first sight for it to potentially be your future spouse. It takes time to know. Start on the right foot by having no expectations or pre-conceived notions.

Don’t write off
First dates in general are throw away dates. You are likely not going to get the whole genuine person on that date because of the pressure. If you think the first date did not go well, try a second date. It will probably be better. If the person did something negative, give them another chance. It can’t hurt to forgive and understand, and see if it persists.

 

Are you dating someone “too” Catholic?

Dear Anthony,

In your article about Lino Rulli, you said he said he does not want someone who is “too” Catholic. Define “too Catholic.” What exactly does that mean? Going to Mass every Sunday? Praying the Rosary everyday? No contraception? Volunteering for pro-life causes? Please enlighten me.

An excellent question, thank you. I felt the same way you do when I first heard him say that. But I was just on his show again and this very thing came up, so I asked him again, “Lino, what do you mean by too Catholic?”

He gave me a satisfactory answer. He does not want someone who will judge him for not praying the rosary every day when she does, or make him feel bad in any way for how he chooses to express his Catholic faith.

I can understand this. I told him that his choice of words is wrong, because technically you never be “too” Catholic. Catholic is Catholic. And the deeper you go in an authentically Catholic life, the better. What he really means is someone with false piety; what I like to call a “pious fraud.” This would be someone who measures everyone else’s Catholic faith by their own expression. Wherever they are, everyone else should be.

Being judgmental, harsh, imposing, negative, insistent, or stand-offish to another is hardly being Catholic. People who have this way are going backwards. It is non-Catholic behavior.

The Holy Spirit works on every individual, and each individual has their own journey. Every other person is merely to be an instrument of grace, not God Himself. We are called to be examples primarily, not control freaks of piety. We inspire others because we are walking proof that Jesus is with us. We are not the authority of another, just their humble servant. We leave the judging to Christ, while following the Lord’s example of mercy to all.

Yes, we are to admonish the sinner, but with fear and trembling. We better make darn sure that the WAY we admonish is considered as much, if not more, as what is admonished. We are never to come across like it is something we ourselves are incapable of or have never done. St. Augustine said, “If not for the grace of God, there go I” when pointing out a sinner. He means that we are all capable of any sin, so admonish the sin while showing love for the sinner.

Lino also mentioned he did not want someone who talks about God all the time, or needs God to be in every conversation. That would be “too Catholic” for him. I think I understand his point. Many people find it annoying if someone is only interested in talking about Theology or overtly religious things, and show no interest in anything else. There is nothing wrong with talking about boat racing, for example, and there is no need to make sure you say things like “Isn’t it something that Jesus went on a boat just like we are able to do” and try and redirect the conversation on a religious sounding path.

I have come across people who are like this. God bless them, it is the way they are. God willing, the men and women like this find each other and have lasting happiness in marriage. Otherwise, they will be a turnoff to most other people who find it uncomfortable or weird to bring God into everything.

It’s important to be a balanced, well rounded, interesting person. God created the world and everything in it for us to enjoy. He is “in” everything, so it is not necessary to speak of Him all the time. Sharing the things of this life honors God who wanted us to have variety and depth.

To be Catholic is to acknowledge God in everything in our hearts. You can never be too Catholic. However, we don’t want to be people who don’t ever want to have those kinds of religious conversations. In fact, it makes total sense that two Catholic people dating would have many wonderful conversations about God and their Catholic Faith, and that they would pray together, visit churches together, attend Mass together, and more.

Are we off the hook now? Having established that no one should be judgmental of us, we can’t just say that where we are in the faith is good enough? On the contrary, it is the love of Christ living in and through the person we are dating that should draw out our own faith. We should want someone in our life that is going to challenge us, help us to become a better person, make us accountable for ourselves.

One of the most important reasons to get married is so you stop being your own authority on your life and give your life in full to your spouse and your children. Once you commit to another in marriage, you are one body, and therefore must stop thinking of just yourself.

Included in this gift of self is the dependency on God’s grace to accomplish the mission of serving others in marriage. You need grace. You need growth. A good spouse will help you grow, whether through the pleasant ways like praying together with you and other challenges to spiritual growth, or through the sufferings that come naturally just by living with other people. Both provide wonderful opportunities to obtain the grace we need to grow as an individual, thus empowering us to service.

“Too Catholic” is just a cop-out term. You cannot go far enough or deep enough as the Holy Spirit inspires love in your heart. It’s like saying of your spouse that they are “too loved.” There is no such thing. Love calls us to go deeper and grow greatly. So does our faith, because it is founded on love. But we can’t get out of hand, nor lose sight of reality. We live in the world, and we dwell among people. We have to be careful not to come across strange as we grow in our faith. Maintaining a balance between how we express our faith and how we experience other aspects of our life will go a much longer way in being attractive to others, and thus leading them to Christ.

The vocation to marriage is a practical vocation that is lived out in the world. If you need to pray all the time, talk only about God, and only be doing directly religious things or charity work, then perhaps you are called to the religious life. For dating and marriage, however, life has to have more variety and address many things of this world. It should be fun and exciting.

There is so much life has to offer that are gifts from God to be experienced and enjoyed. We need only acknowledge they come from God in order to please Him and and for Him to know of your love.

What’s wrong with Lino Rulli?

In case you don’t know, Lino Rulli is the host of “The Catholic Guy” show on Sirius Satellite Radio, on which I am frequently a guest. Lino and I have a great time on his program as we attempt to address issues single Catholics face. Lino also happens to be an eligible bachelor.

As I have gotten to know Lino, I cannot help think that there is no reason a nice guy with a good job and moderately nice looks (I don’t want him to get a big head) should not have success finding a nice girl and settling down. Especially on a Catholic dating site like Ave Maria Singles, of which he is a member.

We have addressed his dating life often and I have heard where he is coming from regarding why he is still unmarried. I know him well enough that he will not mind me asking the question, “What’s wrong with Lino Rulli?”

What’s wrong with Lino is what is wrong with many men and women. Their expectations are way too high. On a recent program, I asked Lino what exactly he’s looking for. He said he wants an Italian girl who lives in New York, is younger than him (preferably much younger), and is Catholic but not too Catholic (???).

That’s being pretty selective. Well, it shouldn’t be too hard, right? New York must be full of Italian not-too-Catholic girls who are much younger than he is. Apparently not. He’s still single.

I suggested that he might be narrowing things too much and probably inhibiting his ability to notice the good women whom God is putting in his path. He seemed to think that God knows him well enough and He is powerful enough to make this happen for him the way he would like. It’s hard to argue with that.

This is what is called the problem of “expectations.” We all have them. It is quite natural to have expectations about the person you hope to meet, fall in love with, and marry. But it can be very crippling to have too many expectations (and worse, unrealistic expectations).

So many people write into us at Ave Maria Singles wanting to know how many people are in their local area. They want to find out if there is someone in their town BEFORE they will join. Surprisingly, this makes sense to them. But it is a very narrow view. You need peripheral vision to understand that this is the wrong approach to meeting someone these days.

The fact is, if the person you are seeking has not been found locally in more natural, traditional ways, it is highly unlikely you will find this person locally in an online search.

So the problem with the Lino Rulli’s of the world is they want what they want, when they want it. Let me say that again. They want….what theywant…..when they want it.

And just like that, God cannot work in their dating lives. Why? Control. We are controlling people. Even those with a strong faith in God still are tempted to want (and insist on having) control of their lives.

That “check list” of requirements in the person we will marry is quite long, and always getting longer as time goes by and our age increases. That’s because as we age, we become set in our ways and more particular in our tastes. The limitations we impose on those we date can prohibit us from seeing the very obvious good person who can be right in our path.

The more expectations we have the blinder we get. And expectations of others without a balance of expectations on ourselves is unwise. We get to the point where all that matters is that we have our own desires are satisfied, and we give no thought to what the other person might expect of us. So what is the answer? It is something we generally don’t like to hear. Be open-minded and attentive to the people whom God does put in your path. Shut down the fantasies of those whom you want to come along but never will. They are phantoms, mirages. They are distractions that blind you to the people God wants you to meet and choose from.

I believe Lino could be married and with many children by now. He will argue that the right one has not come along. I would argue that he is right ONLY in the sense that it is based on his own benchmark, not an authentic openness to God’s will.

I feel sorry for those who are focused on a long list of expectations, especially when they do nothing about improving themselves. I personally don’t believe that most unmarried Catholics are incapable of being married. I just think they don’t “measure up” to the impossible standards that so many people have.

And the result? Too many people who “should” be married are not. And babies that “should” be brought into the world are not. And all this because the girl is not Italian? Doesn’t live in New York? Is too Catholic? Is not the right age?

There are some expectations that are critical. The person needs to have God as the authority of their life, Whom they defer to when they need direction, forgiveness and mercy. They need to be someone who desires to become a better person, growing in virtue, and be capable of forgiving others and asking for forgiveness.

Resist the temptation to be overly critical of others based on your personal tastes and be open to the beauty and uniqueness that each person has to share. And find a way to limit those requirements. Do you really want to pass up on a God-send just because they don’t live in your area?

The good news is Lino has reformed his ways and no longer requires an Italian. So there is hope for us all.

Lino, you know I love ya. :-)

 

Can Mass get in the way of our relationship?

Dear Anthony,

Do you think it is too rigid for a Traditional Catholic who attends only the Tridentine High Mass to marry a Catholic who attends the Novus Ordo Mass celebrated in Latin and also attends a  Novus Ordo daily Mass in English?

Based on your use of the word “rigid” to ask this question, I can tell that you believe the answer to your own question is yes. I assume that you are in a serious relationship with a wonderful person whom you probably love. You probably cannot believe that you are hitting a stumbling block because of the Mass.

I can’t blame you for being frustrated. I don’t know the context of this question, but I think I can offer you some thoughts on this that could be useful.

First, it is worth saying that as Christians, the way we worship God is as high in importance as the act of worshiping God. It is a very personal thing, and very defining about who we are as a person. The greater our faith, the more important our desire to worship God is.

Therefore, we cannot blame or pass judgment on someone for their preferences on how to worship God. The Holy Sacrifice of the Mass is the primary act of worship of God the Father. This worship of the Father in the Mass is done by Jesus Christ, His Son, via His one sacrifice on Calvary that is represented at the altar via the Catholic priest, who leads those present at the Mass. As the faithful attending, we worship God the Father along with Jesus through the priest at the Altar. That is basically and substantially what the Mass is.

Every Mass is a “Liturgy,” which means, “the work of the people.” It is our work of worship to God the Father that is due to Him by us, His creation and His children. There are different liturgical expressions to accomplish this one act of worship. Therefore, there are many different approved ways of liturgical expression that a Catholic.

Typically, a Catholic “belongs” to a particular Rite. For example, I am a Catholic of the Roman Rite. Some people belong to one of the many rites in the one Eastern Rite. These Rites are all approved by the Pope and are in union with him.

Here is where it is a little tricky and relates to what you are experiencing. In the Roman Rite, there is something that is not experienced by Eastern Rite Catholics. For those in the Roman Rite, there are two liturgical rites that are approved for the celebration of the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass. There is the old Rite, commonly called the Tridentine Rite, and the new Rite that was implemented after the Second Vatican Council, called the Novus Ordo (the new order).

To make a long story short (and I am really trying to simplify that which is more complicated), the co-existence of these two liturgical rites are not typically harmoniously accepted by Roman Rite Catholics. They are both now available and approved. They both fulfill the duty required by the Catholic Church for worshiping God at Sunday Mass. However, there are those who feel that one is superior to the other, rather than just leaving it at being a blessing to have both, and thanking God that those who prefer either can attend the liturgical expression of their choice.

Unfortunately, there are those who believe that the Tridentine Rite (also known as the Traditional Mass, which is in the language of Latin) is superior to the Novus Ordo Rite (the new Mass most of us are used to attending which is in the English language). Many priests have begun saying the Novus Ordo Rite in Latin in order to make the Mass more reverent, as is their legitimate option. However, it is still the new order of the Mass, and not the Tridentine Rite structure. For some, this is still not good enough, and they think the Tridentine Rite is the only Rite that should be used.

Whether they are right or wrong is irrelevant. The Catholic Church (for now, anyway) officially recognizes both expressions of the liturgy. Therefore, it is wrong for anyone to make a person feel bad because they attend one over the other. We Catholic Christians have enough problems in this world that we don’t need to be fighting and causing problems with each other.

For couples, however, there is more to this that needs to be considered. Since people do have liturgical preferences, and worshipping God is central to our life as Christians, the issue of how a couple worship God should be taken very seriously.

At every Mass, we are attending a marriage ceremony; the marriage of Christ and His Church. The sacrifice of Christ on Calvary (represented at the altar) is when Christ married His bride, the Church. Therefore, our own sacramental marriages are to be a symbol of the marriage of Christ and His Church. It stands to reason that if a married couple is attempting to live the example of Jesus’ marriage to the Church, that the married couple attend Mass together.

Granted, it can happen that a genuinely good, happy, loving marriage is possible where the two people do not worship God together. But in the sense of the ideal, it does not make sense.

Both the Tridentine Mass and the Novus Ordo Mass are “The Mass.” What is essential for worshiping God as a Catholic is present in both liturgical expressions. So for couples, it should never be an issue of the validity of either. However, when it comes to preference, I can see how attendance of either can become an issue.

If one grew up on the traditional liturgy and loves it, prefers it, and essentially cannot give it up without it affecting who they are as a person, then whomever they date will likely have to share the same depth of love for the traditional liturgy in order for that relationship to work. Or, the other person might not care either way, and is fine with changing over to the Tridentine Mass. The difference is that there is an informed decision that results in two people moving in the same direction.

However, if a person insists on the Tridentine Mass and treats the Novus Ordo Mass with contempt or resentment, this is not a good thing. An approved Mass deserves the highest respect. I have experienced people who express various negativity when it comes to the Novus Ordo Mass.

There is nothing wrong with attending a Novus Ordo Mass if you prefer the Tridentine Mass. The rigidity you sense in this person you are dating is a red flag to be talked about and monitored as your relationship continues. It is fine to prefer a liturgical expression, but if the person displays disapproval about your preference or causes problems about it, I would consider that a warning sign. I can totally understand preference, but I cannot understand intolerance and disturbance that affects a person’s being. Not for a legitimate Mass. Rigidity that makes a person feel bad about what they prefer is not good for a healthy relationship.

God is love, and our mission as Christians is to love. To love is to be accepting, tolerant, and considerate. A person who is quick to criticize without consideration of a person’s feelings could have several issues that can damage a relationship. Being critical and judgment about the Mass a person chooses to attend is seriously wrong.

Your liturgical preferences are not an insurmountable obstacle. If you can discuss these issues in a compassionate way, you have something to build on. If the rigidity you referred to really exists, you might want to consider whether this is an indication of more serious issues.

Yours in Christ,

Anthony

 

Should I be flirting more?

Dear Anthony: I feel that I am competing with women who are more flirtatious than me. A nice mam I am seeing likes to look at women who dress a little more provocative and who flirt. I am not like that; I’m just myself. I dress modern and pretty, but I don’t really like to show too much flesh or wear things that make certain parts of my body stand out. Is that so wrong? I’m not “prudish”, but I respect myself and believe God expects women to behave appropriately. Do I need to be more flirty, or should I just continue being the way I believe I should be?

First, I want to applaud you. It is very important for women to be sensitive and mindful to the way they dress and behave in public, particular with men. You are obviously a conscientious Christian woman who loves God and does not want to offend Him, and want to attract a normal, upright Catholic man with strong faith and who respects women.

You have answered your own question just by the way you are presenting your concern. You don’t want to change, nor should you. Anyone who betrays who they are just because it will get them in better with another person is only causing harm to themselves and anyone whom they interact with. So you have to faithful to yourself and your beliefs. Obviously, you don’t want to dress provocatively, nor do you want to be a shameless flirt. I applaud that.

It is alarming how much of an issue this has become among Catholics, of all people, who should be wiser than to be suckered into this mentality. I have addressed this subject on my blog before. I am sure I will be addressing it again in the future.

It’s important to point out that flirting has its place in a relationship. Is flirting necessary? Technically no, though most people find flirting to be a sign that they are with a normal person. I guess if two people who don’t flirt all, nor like to, nor know how to, are able to meet and interact without any need of what flirting provides, then it is not necessary. But most people need flirting to help them relax and gain confidence as they develop a relationship. Married couples find it important, too, for making each other feel good and special. It does have its place in relationships.

Let’s first take a look at the word. I like definitions to give us perspective. The dictionary defines flirt as, “to court triflingly or act amorously without serious intentions”. Trifling meaning insignificant or trivial. Amorously meaning inclined or disposed to love. Synonyms are tease, entice, playful. It’s interesting it uses the word “court.” I doubt that much flirting that goes on is in the context of courtship. But we can work with this definition.

The implication is that to flirt is to interact with a member of the opposite sex in a playful, teasing kind of way in the context of love. Another way to put it is we “dabble” with someone in the love arena. Some “dabble” and keep it innocent and all in good fun. Some “dabble” with the openness to it becoming something more (for better or for worse). It’s like flirting with disaster. We dabble in something dangerous, but seemingly not enough for it to really be life threatening.

I think there is a modesty required when it comes to flirting, however. What I just described above is what I would call modest flirtation. Modesty, of course, means balance; not over or under doing it. In this case, not too over the top or aggressive, and not too lacking or vacant.

Over-the-top flirting is not what you think it is. It’s hard to define what is over-the-top when there is flirting between two people. But there can be a recklessness to flirting that affects others you have no business gaining the attention of. This would be the “shameless flirt;” someone who makes no apologies for dressing provocatively in public and behaving in ways that attract the eye of anyone who might want to partake in their display; someone who does not mind meeting eyes with a man who is with another woman. (Men can do this to women as well).

It is very difficult for men today. There are so many women out in public who do not mind attracting men, so they dress to do it and act in ways that will do it. Men often just cannot help but notice. So we must not be too hard on men when it comes to noticing provocative, flirty women (or just beautiful looking women in general who are not trying to be provocative, nor intend to be).

But it’s what men do next that defines their character. They could A) catch themselves noticing the woman and immediately turn their head away, B) turn away but give a second glance, or C) just stare and check her out until he is done. Perhaps a D would be that he never notices her at all and remains caught up in the eyes of the girl he is with. Isn’t that romantic? You bet it is. But that is a tall order, so let’s not be too quick to criticize him (though there are men who will definitely do that).

The first shows self-control and requires the practice of self-discipline. The first also shows that there is nothing wrong with noticing the woman in the first place, and that he is a normal, functioning male. B and C tell something not so flattering about the man. He is easily lured away by that type of woman. Perhaps he is also weak in his spiritual life that he does not know the obvious; that it is wrong to glare and stare a woman. He is also possibly naïve to think that this cannot do anything negative to harm him at any level as he observes the woman.

It is natural that a woman would feel as you feel when with a man who does this to her. Women are all about security and feeling special. A man has to impress upon the woman he is interested in that she is the focus of his being; which includes his eyes as well as his heart. He is wrong to observe other women at all as he pursues her, let alone in her presence (come on, guys!). Okay, so the initial noticing of the provocative woman you can get away with. But don’t give the second glance, and don’t stare as to consume her through your eyes.

This is a real dilemma women like yourself are in. You want to give men their due chances, both to overcome these things and also to prove his ability to make you feel like the most unique and special woman in the world. A man really must do both. If he cannot, then you need to move on. But by all means, do not succumb to the temptation to change yourself just to gain the attention of a man.

I would advise that you become more graceful, more interesting, and just overall irresistible because of your charms. Look elegant and pretty without being provocative looking. Behave charmingly, gracefully, and adorably without being seductive and inappropriate. Respect yourself and be confident. Flirt modestly, like someone in a Jane Austen book. And above all, be a woman of virtue, values and integrity. Don’t let these provocative, immodest flirty women bring you down. They cannot compete with what you have to offer.

God is pleased with women who conduct themselves as real women who care about men. Men must respond by showing they care about women by conducting themselves like real men. They are not called “gentle-men” for nothing. If men are migrating to those women, they are passing up the great feast just to have junk food. And they are not the gentleman you want to make your husband and the father of your children.

 

 

An Alternative Route

Dear Anthony, I really thought that I had found “the one,” but things didn’t work out. In trying to find peace in this, I find myself increasingly frustrated. How could God allow me to go so far astray? I want to do God’s will, but I also want to shake this feeling like God knew everything that would happen and allowed it.

This is a painful thing to go through, so I am very sorry to hear this and offer you my prayers. It is so challenging to be ready to make a commitment to marriage and have invested so much in someone, to the point of falling in love, only to have this person you believe is the one for you be taken from you.

Be careful about the notion of God knowing everything in the sense of having control of the situation, or the sense of predestination. Your question seems to be if God already planned for this man to NOT be the one, why does it seem this man WAS the one?

It’s true that God knows what is going to happen, but that is only because he is outside of time and has seen our entire life happen. He has worked to influence our life, but also has seen our decisions (whether with or against His will), and has tried further attempts to help us via each decision (if they are not compatible with His will). We are in time, so we have to wait for life to play out. He has seen our life, but He was also there in every moment.

So here we are right now, facing decisions, and experiencing God’s influences. He is working on us and for us right now. We have not yet made our decisions for the day, and God is not choosing for us. But He does know already what we will decide because it has already happened for Him (being outside of time, He can see it).

Isn’t it frustrating when someone says to you “I knew you were going to do that.” We are frustrated because we say “How could you know? I didn’t even know what I was going to do.” But the person knows you so well that they just knew. It does not surprise them. But you don’t like someone knowing you so well that they know what you are going to do or say. Love binds two people so much that this really happens. The deeper the love, the greater the knowledge of the other person, including anticipating their thoughts and actions.

The difference is, despite how much we might know someone else and ability to anticipate their thoughts, actions and feelings, we don’t really “know” absolutely, nor do we know how the future will be affected. God does. He knows us so well and knows what we are doing to do or say, but He also knows how our moments could play out for the next moments. So He works to help our next moves via our decisions in the moment. Yet, He knows how all moments will play out, regardless of His influences. We can never know that. God can.

Some people find peace in knowing God knows all things, and how our lives are going to play out. Some people don’t like that at all. The ones who do probably understand that they have a free will and that God is sending His grace at all times to help them in their decisions. Their peace is in knowing that no matter what they decide, God works out for the good those who put their trust in Him and stay close to Him. Even if they fall from grace, God loves them so much that the Holy Spirit convicts them of sin, and inspires them to turn back to God to ask forgiveness and His mercy and to change their life or correct that wrong or bad decision.

Those who don’t like it that God knows all things about our lives are frustrated because they are attached to their own plans that they want God to accept and make happen. They don’t like not having control. Perhaps a part of them thinks they really don’t have free will, since things will happen as they are going to happen anyway. Or perhaps they think that no matter how much close they stay to God, other people mess things up by their bad decisions, thus messing up your life as well.

God’s ultimate will is that we get to Heaven, and He is always working on our alternative routes to get us there, should we ever veer off the road of His will as He plans for us. It is a comforting thing, isn’t it? He will make sure we always have an alternative route to Heaven, as long as we want to be with Him. That is the primary roll of our free will as God gave it to us; to choose God and to be with Him forever. Our time here on earth is about accomplishing that. Anything we want or choose that does not accomplish that is an abuse of the purpose of the free will gift God gave us. So any person, place, thing, thought, desire, etc., that does not work in God’s plan for us is a threat to our eternal salvation, and God has to do something about that for our own sakes.

But if we don’t choose the road He planned for us and where He is waiting for us, He loves us so much that he creates another road, an alternative route, that will get us to Him and where He now waits. God is all action. That is one of His attributes. He never sleeps, he never waits. He acts. He is always right here with us, working on us, working with us, always loving us. If we ask Him to leave us by our sins, He still loves us enough to inspire us to come back to Him. We must choose it though. That is the only thing God waits for. He waits for us to choose Him, and then (very often) that is the only time He can take the action that is His will for us or others (i.e., waiting for certain prayers or the offering of certain sufferings in order to save the souls of others). The Holy Spirit is always working on us to inspire us to make acts of love by our own free will.

It is really frustrating when we were convinced God did certain things to get us to some point and that something that we wanted or expected to happen does not happen. We “knew” it was what God wanted for us or what was meant to be, but it does not go as we thought. How can that be? How could we have gotten it so wrong? Does that mean we are actually further from God than we thought? Does that mean God does not really want us to have what we want?

Unfortunately, the only answer to these questions is that we are not God, and no one has privy to what God is going to do. Jesus said that even He did not know the time of the end of the world, but only the Father. It stands to reason that only God knows what He is going to do, and the “why” of it.

St. Therese of Lisieux said that God would not give us a desire that cannot be fulfilled. In other words, the desire itself is of God, if it is a good desire. The best desire is to be with God forever in Heaven, and to serve Him in this life. If we desire that, than God cannot help but grant us our heart’s desire. Every other desire is subjective. If we desire to have a certain person in our life and don’t get that person, does it mean that God gave us the desire for that person but intended to never give that person to us? Not exactly. It might not be the right timing, and perhaps we are ruining the desire by wanting it fulfilled in our time, not God’s time. Or we might not see the full affects of having that person in our life, and God in His mercy and love for us, seeing that this person will ultimately be to our ruin, does what He can to make sure we do not have that person, as a good Father would. Because we don’t see the full affects, we can only see that God does not want our desire fulfilled, and that makes us sad or mad.

We are not God, therefore we should be humble before Him and accept the suffering of not getting what we want. We should trust in Him and have unwavering peace. Ultimately, if we remain friends with God and fulfill His commandment to love one another as He has loved us, and live the sacramental life we are called to, we will successfully pass our test of being in this world, and end up with God forever in Heaven.

 

Humility in being “good enough.”

(In response to Lisa’s comment on “I’m not good enough for you” article, whose comment is paraphrased here)

I am beginning to develop a new friendship and this man keeps telling me what a ‘good’ person I am.  This makes me uncomfortable.  Other men have felt they were not good enough for me, which we know is ridiculous.   I have fear that my pride can get involved  and I will lose humility in thinking I really am good.  After reading your comments and reflecting on previous experiences I am realizing that I must not be showing my true self, warts and all.  Do you think it could be that I am not being as open and honest with myself or others with which I am developing a relationship?

I applaud you for considering how you present yourself in the relationship (warts and all, as you say).  That is admirable.  We should not feel we have to force ourselves to show our weaknesses, faults and bad habits. We should just be ourselves.  Those things will come out alongside the good qualities.  If you wear a mask (only showing others what you want them to see), this would be deception.  It is also not practical because your true and whole self will come out eventually.

My guess is these men have guilt about their own lack of trust in God and their decisions to not improve themselves.  Therefore, when they meet a good person, they can’t bear it too long because it means they have to change something about themselves.  So they make the “you’re too good for me” excuse.  Women, of course, do this as well.

People willing to say “you’re so good and I don’t deserve you” need to confront themselves before the Eucharistic Lord.  They need to wake up to the reality that they are hurting themselves, as well as the person that they “could have” had if they were not so prideful. They stand before a good person who also has flaws and issues, but they do not see those things.  They only see the good things, and they make the fallacious assumption that the person is “too good” to be interested in them.

This is utterly ridiculous (to be casual), and actually quite prideful and even sinful (to be very direct).  It is a sin to believe any person is “too good.”  Jesus Himself rebuked someone for saying he was “good.”  In rebuke, He says that only God is good.  Did that mean Jesus was not pure goodness?  No.  He was making a point to give us an example to follow. The point is that no one is good except for God.  Any good we offer to another person comes from God, Who lives in us and through us.

We should all strive to become better  ”good people.”  That only means we are working on our relationship with God.  Those who are reluctant to move forward in a dating relationship with a person they believe is too “good” for them are basically telling that person “Hey, my relationship with God is not where it should be, nor am I working on making it better.” They are also saying, “You must be God because you are so good, and that is what you need me to be in order to be with you.”  That second point is very scary.  People need to realize that they have the capability of making the other person a god.  Human beings are NOT God.

As Christians we share the Divine nature via our Baptism, so we are very much like God. But we are sinners.  We sin daily.  We all have our shortcomings and negative qualities  It is a sin to make someone else out to be a god and expect them to be your savior.  Worse, it is a sin to sabotage our relationships with other human beings by considering them to be God.

Only God can love as each person needs.  The objective of each person is to love others as God loves us, as Jesus taught us to love, and to do that as far as we can by God’s grace.  It is grace that makes us “good people.” The better we are, the more of Jesus Christ we project to others.

For someone to say you are good is definitely a compliment.  There is nothing wrong with allowing yourself to feel proud about someone saying that.  It is when we consider ourselves “good” by our own power that we give way to the sin of pride.

For someone to say you are too good for them is an excuse.  It can only mean that they feel guilty around you.  You are a reminder to them that they have chosen to reject God’s grace and invitation to become a better person.   They are blind to your flaws and are accusing you of not being a fellow human being, a fellow sinner.  They need you to be as bad as they are to justify where they are in their spiritual life and be comfortable in their lack of efforts to get closer to the Eucharistic Lord.  You are a real threat.

When they actually back off the relationship or end it, they have decided that your goodness is not an example they are able to follow.  You are drawing them closer to Christ.  Though this is a good thing, they don’t want that kind of confrontation.  Rather, they have decided that is not what they want and therefore they cannot continue being around you. They will seek someone who is as weak as they are.

This might sound like I am being pretty harsh on those who feel that they are with someone who is too good for them.  But all I am trying to do is make them consider certain things they may not have considered before. I hope that they use their experiences of meeting someone they believe is too good for them as an opportunity to get their act together, and NOT just settle on finding someone as weak and distant from God as they are.

I want everyone to accept that all persons are sinners and flawed. That marriage is between two sinners who will be helpmates to each other toward their personal sanctity, not two saints who don’t need each other or one is so good that the other is the only one who will benefit.  That meeting a good person is an encounter with God through that person, and an invitation by God to get closer to Him.  That the feeling of another person being too good for you means that you are not accepting the other’s flaws and shortcomings, and this will always hurt your ability to have a healthy relationship that grows in love with Jesus Christ at the center.

Think of what Purgatory is.  When we die, we immediately come face-to-face with Jesus for the particular judgment.  We see Jesus in all His glory, goodness, and love.   The light is blinding and very revealing.  The light of Christ causes us to see ourselves for who we are and all we have done in our lifetime. Though we recognize that we are worthy to be with God in Heaven for all eternity, we are not quite ready.  We notice that we are not yet presentable enough to meet the Father and dwell in Heaven.  So we tell the Jesus, “Lord, please, allow me to make myself presentable before entering.”   We know by the light of Christ that we “must” spend time in Purgatory before we are ready to enter into Heaven.

This is how it should be for those who feel they are not worthy of someone.  If anything, it should be that the person we think so good is a light of Christ revealing who we should strive to become.  The Purgatory on earth is the time we spend WITH the flawed person. We are perfected as we share a lifetime of joys and sorrows WITH that person whom we discover is as sinful and flawed as we are, while at the same time being drawn to Christ through that person’s goodness and positive qualities. Enduring each others faults purifies us, while enjoying each other’s goodness makes us a gift to the other.

No one should feel someone is too good for them.  That would mean that you believe you are unworthy.  That is just not true.  A genuinely good person is one who knows they are a sinner but trusts in God’s goodness. A truly good person wants to share all that is good in them with others, especially one special person in marital love.  What a gift two people give to each other who have that humility and practicality about human love and marriage.