Category Archives: Marriage

Why marriage is the cure to selfishness

I read a recent article that started out by saying that “all marriages start off very selfishly.” He went on to say that people realize into the marriage that they can’t be so selfish and act accordingly.  It’s not quite that simple.

Catholic teaching tells us that everyone born is selfish due to original sin that configured humanity to a condition of a self-serving nature.  In Christ, through Baptism, original sin is removed, but its effects remain. Thus, we still have that strong tendency to serve ourselves as the priority in our lives.  Thanks be to God, Baptism also configures us to Jesus Christ and we share His divine nature, making grace available to us.

Now let’s look at selfishness from a practical level as it applies to dating, love and marriage.

Yes, it’s true that marriages start of very selfishly.  However, Christian marriage is a call to a selfless exchange of two people who become one in every way, and subsequently share that love with others.

This is a tall order.  More than half of all marriages fall short of this ideal. I would argue there are many that maintain their marriages but suffer tremendous strain due to unwillingness to address the weaknesses where love fails or is diminished, causing an environment that is contrary to the marriage ideal.

It’s easy to accuse one or both persons of being too selfish.  Is it selfish for a unhappy wife to want the affection of her husband when there is none?  Is it selfish of an unhappy husband to expect the emotional support of his wife but not receive it?

There is a place for selfishness.  Some selfishness is better identified as our “needs.”  Our needs are important and have an effect on how we love another.  If no needs are met as were expected, then love can die.  Should it die?  Probably not, if we only focus on loving as Jesus loved, which is a giving and self-donation without getting it in return.  But only God can live this kind of love.

Human beings fall short of this kind of love.  And it will always be this way.  Marital love is a tall order because it’s unnatural for human beings to accomplish.  It’s impossible because we all have needs, and we all have expectations as to how those needs should be met.  It’s not for us to discount these needs.  But it’s also not for us to excuse our behavior based on these needs.

The key is to accept that we are selfish people throughout our whole lives, and that success in marriage between two human beings is in embracing each other’s humanness as the probability, while mutually striving to become more like that unnatural divine love that is God.  We need to accept that 1) we are selfish and need to work on becoming less selfish, 2) only God can love us perfectly, and 3) any human being is going to fail at times in true love. This kind of acceptance goes a long way in how we approach our own needs as well as the needs of the person we love.

There is still the matter of our valid needs that do have to be met, at least often enough to keep us afloat. No person can sustain providing love to another by meeting all their needs, while having no need of their own met.  That’s not marital love.  Marital love requires both persons participating in the game. When one is down and lacks the ability at the time to give, the other needs to be the stronger one, and vice versa.

In a word, successful marriage between two very non-perfect people is a sharing of love that embraces the other’s selfishness in their moments of selfish acts.  When a selfish act is presented by one, it’s imperative that the other act selflessly in response in order to help rectify the situation and restore peace.  If both act selfishly through actions and reactions, the course toward failed marriage is set.

But I have already said that we are all selfish, and it’s unnatural to be selfless.  Exactly! Christian marriage is impossible without God.  More to the point, two human beings cannot sustain love for a lifetime without divine influence.

In order find a genuine love that can make a marriage work, you have to be committed to working on your selfishness.  It’s a ferocious passion not easily tamed.  If unchecked, we shouldn’t be surprised when not only can we not meet another person’s needs, we can’t recognize a person capable of meeting our needs.

We work on our selfishness primarily by selfless acts.  We have to practice it in order to improve.  It’s called “character development.”  A person of good character is not someone who is no longer selfish.  Rather, it’s a person who recognizes that selfishness is behind the problems, and capable of seeing the good and positive qualities of another above any bad decisions, mistakes, or unattractive qualities.

Marriage is the cure to selfishness because it forces a person to get out of themselves and tend to their spouse and children.  However, marriage only works to cure selfishness as both people are permitted to have setbacks because of selfish moments, and grow in selflessness together by being interested in and attentive to each other’s needs as they struggle and grow.  That is love that cannot fail.

Are we getting married too soon?

Dear Anthony,

My pastor is skeptical that long distance relationships can have the personal and practical growth to move toward marriage. My fiance lives in California, and I’m in Canada. He first wrote me on AMS nine months ago. We met the first time two months ago. A month ago I flew to California for our second in person meeting. He proposed. I flew home to pray about it and a few days later said yes. We believe we have the maturity, love, and shared spiritual life to begin marriage. We would like to co-operate with our pastor, however, it does seem that Father already has some preconceived ideas about long distance dating. Do you have any advice we can share with him?

It’s obviously you are both deeply in love and want to share your life together. But I can certainly see why your pastor has concerns.

Only the two of you can make this decision. Not even your pastor’s concerns can stop either of you from your fundamental right to be married if you so choose. I, too, certainly have no way of knowing if this is what you should or shouldn’t do, nor advise you either way. It is your decision, and whatever decision you make should be supported by anyone in your life who loves you, and will definitely be accepted by the Church under the permissible canonical conditions which I assume are in place (i.e., both free to marry in the Church, both baptized, etc.)

Your pastor’s concerns, I believe, are not so much your long distance relationship, but the short length of time knowing each other and only meeting twice.

I’m sure for the two of you, the nine months you have known each other seem like a lifetime. No one can fully understand how two people can have such deep love and commitment in such a short time. It’s natural for others observing from the outside to consider factors of the situation and be skeptical. They have no connection or participation in your mutual love experience, so it’s impossible for them to know the full story.

However, their opinions regarding the facts are worth hearing out and considering, because it’s not uncommon that the love that develops so rapidly that it clouds and blinds prudence and reason. So having an open mind to what those you love or respect have to say from their observations and experiences is a good practice.

There are a few points I would like to share with you as food for thought that perhaps you have no considered and might find helpful as you continue toward your intention to marry.

The length of time you have known each other is a serious concern. No matter how much you know each other right now, it’s not as much as you think when it comes to a decision to marry. Sharing things about each other is not enough. Experiencing each other in person in all kinds of situations and with all kinds of other people provides a great deal of important information to know about the other.

Many common marriage problems are due to behaviors and attitudes. How you both react in uncomfortable situations or under stress. How both of you behave around or treat each other’s family and friends. Seeing what gets both of you upset or how you work through an argument. What issues of your past come up and under what circumstances. How you communicate with each other and work together to resolve problems or make important and not so important decisions.

Then there is non-verbal communication, which is what makes up the majority of how we communicate with other human beings. It’s impossible to experience body language without being together in person. Therefore, it’s impossible to know how you react to each other’s body language.

Responding to the call of love and deciding to marry must include an acceptance of anything negative about each other, including all bad habits, personal scars, behavior patterns, etc. You can’t fully know what these are unless you experience them first hand and share them as they come up. And when shared, there is nothing that can replace eye contact and hand holding and the like when it comes to accepting.

My concern is that the two of you have not had enough in-person time to experience so much of each other that needs to be experienced before deciding to marry. Have you spent enough time with each other’s friends and family? Have you determined that you both accept each other’s friends and have shown you are not jealous or possessive? Whoever is doing the moving to the other’s country, have you had enough time to help the family members process that?

Only the two of you can answer this, of course. If you are ready and fully accept each other, then wonderful! Let no one’s concerns, including your pastor’s, prevent you from moving forward.

Long distance relationships are very challenging. You want to make sure you know what you are doing as far as possible. Another three or six months of getting together in person can only help.

I would suggest you consider telling your pastor you will make a short term commitment to spend more in-person time together before getting engaged, then meeting with him several times together. He will feel a lot better and be impressed that you would make such an effort.

Would you date you?

Would the type of person you are praying to meet and fall in love with find you attractive?

When and if it should happen that you meet someone special, fall in love, and get married, the process starts with you.  This is the premise of my first book, Would You Date You?

I appeared on “The Catholic Guy” show last week to talk about my new book. Lino Rulli and Fr. Rob were in rare form as they attempted to figure out just what the title was supposed to mean.  And we must have spent fifteen minutes talking about the Forward.  Why, you ask?  Well, Lino wrote the Forward, and he is very proud of it.

Finally, I shouted, “Hey, enough with the Forward!  What about the book?”  He shouted back at me, then Fr. Rob had to break it up.  In the end, Lino asked me to sign his copy on the air, which I did.  It read “To my friend, Lino.  No, I would not date you, if I were you.  Anthony.”  Seriously, it was a great show.

But I was thinking to myself, I bet I could have interviewed myself better than Lino did.  Then I thought to myself, why not?  So the following is an interview with Anthony Buono, interviewed by Anthony Buono, about his new book, Would You Date You?

Anthony, congratulations on your new book.  Why did you decide to write it?

Thank you.  I was actually approached by Franciscan Media last July to write a book.  What kind of book?, I asked.  Something for single Catholics.  Okay, anything specific?  Whatever you want.  But we need an outline in August.  They approved the outline and we agreed on a finished manuscript by the end of January of this year.  One distraction after another, and it was January.  No finished chapters.  My publisher emails: “Happy New Year!  So how’s the book coming?”  Oh yeah, the book.  Oh boy.  Um….”It’s coming along swimmingly.  About half way there.”  So I commit completely to working on the book, and by mid-February, they had a finished manuscript.  I felt like I was back in college when I wrote term papers the week before they were due at the end of the semester.

Who do you think should read this book?

I think the answer is pretty obvious, Anthony, but all right.  From my experience, many people who want to be married believe that they’re a prize catch, and that any problems in relationships are the fault of the other person.  It’s great to be confident, but problems are always a two way street. We can always find something we could have done better.  No one is beyond self-examination and self-improvement.  This book provides consideration on qualities everyone should be working on, helping you become a better person, and become more attractive.  Did I answer your question?  I guess I’ll just say everyone should read this book.

What is the most surprising advice in your book?

I don’t want to give it away.  But I’ll give you a hint.  Knowing if the person has this quality is more important than if the person is Catholic or not (and there are those who say they’re Catholic who don’t have this quality).  But that’s not very fair of me, is it?  A piece of advice in the book that might also be very surprising is why it’s good to be cautious and protective when it comes to kissing, because kissing is the gateway to all sexual promiscuity. I think once you understand that, you have some real power to go into your dating relationships and make a real difference in the chastity department.

What’s the best piece of advice in this book?

That you would not, in fact, date you, because there is not another you out there.  Just kidding! I don’t say that in the book. Well, not exactly.  I do believe it is futile to get too caught up in trying to find someone like yourself.  The mystery of love doesn’t work that way.  Those who try to find someone like themselves usually end up attracted to someone very different. Better preparation for the dating process (and for love) is to discover and know who you are.  Being comfortable with yourself and having a working knowledge of what needs improvement makes you much more attractive to the person you want to meet, and allows you to bring a real person to the relationship.  Humility about your true self as a whole helps you become willing to accept an imperfect person you’ll actually date, not the perfect person you’ll never meet.   Hey, that was pretty good.  Can you tweet that for me, Anthony?  Anyway, people get caught up in what they want and don’t develop as an individual. So really, the best advice in this book is the overall message: work on knowing yourself.

Do you think this book will help people take action for the sake of their vocation to marriage?

Gosh, I hope so. If they do nothing else, I hope they will at least try out putting the last chapter into practice.  The questions to consider while kneeling before the crucifix are focused on examining the conscience of people who want to be married. I wanted the book to inspire people to take accountability for their own life, have the humility to admit their own faults, and have the courage to do something about it.  But not take themselves too seriously, or become easily discouraged.  The book is about becoming, and we are all always in the process of becoming. Even in marriage, that process continues, so we don’t wait to marry someone who has arrived, but someone who is suitable to share the journey with you.

What is the worst thing about this book?

Having to suffer through interviews (no offense to you, Anthony).  Actually, to be serious, the worst thing about this book is that it was written too fast (that’s what I get for procrastinating).  As I read it, I’m like “Oh gosh, I wish I wrote this instead of that”, and wish I had more time to revisit the chapters.  But my publisher tells me that the worst part about this book is that it’s too short.

Well, I did a pretty good job of interviewing myself.  But to my credit, I’m easy to talk to, especially to myself.  But here’s what I learned about myself as I conducted this interview.  That I rarely actually answer an interview question because I’m so tangential.  Now it makes sense why Lino changes the subject on me so often.  I guess that’s why he gets the big bucks.

To get a copy of Would You Date You?, click here.  And please send me your feedback, positive or negative :-)

Marriage of the Lamb

No matter how many times I attend Mass, I still rarely attend with the presence of mind to realize I am attending a marriage ceremony.  The most central and important aspect of my Christian life, and it just doesn’t occur to me that this is a wedding taking place.

More specifically, the Mass is the marriage of the Lamb; Christ, the bridegroom, wedding His bride, the Church.

I became very interested in this concept a few years ago while becoming curious about the specific Scripture options available to couples for the Nuptial Mass.  Every couple who chooses to be married in the Catholic Church has to choose one Old Testament, one Psalm, one New Testament, and one Gospel reading to be read during their marriage ceremony.

My question was why did the Church choose all of these as options?  I thought it might be interesting to do a television/radio series that discussed each of these Scripture options and learn why the Church choose them and how they pertain to marriage between two human beings.  Fr. Edward Connolly (my co-host of Road To Cana) agreed it would be an interesting project.

As we tried to come up with a name for the series, it became clearly obvious to us both that it should be called “Marriage of the Lamb” because every Christian marriage is called to be a witness to the marriage of Christ and His bride, the Church.  Each of the Scripture reading options point to marriage as it was designed by God to be lived out, based on the central act of love of Christ dying on the Cross.

I think most Christians get this idea of Jesus dying on the Cross as our Saviour and Redeemer.  But when you look at that crucifix, do you ever see a bridegroom?  It’s not exactly the image we care to depict when it comes to marriage.  Yet, that’s exactly what every Christian marriage is meant to be; a bridegroom on the cross and a bride joined in union to her husband through sacrificial love.

Think about some of the beautiful imagery within the Mass that reveals the wedding ceremony taking place. Jesus is the source of life. Jesus establishes a covenant that is new and everlasting.  The Church is His bride.  The moment of consecration is the wedding and consummation. The reception of the food of Holy Communion which we consume unites us to Christ.  Jesus establishes a covenant that is new and everlasting with His Bride, the Church, which is His mystical body.

This is why a priest is very much a husband and why he is called father.  It’s also why a woman will never be a Catholic priest.  A husband is a male, a wife is a female.  The priest represents Christ, the husband.  The laity represent the Church, the wife.

Traditionally, the role of a husband is to be food and drink for his wife. He is provider of the material food and drink that nourishes the physical body, as well as the provider of the spiritual food to nourish the soul of his family by being the spiritual leader. He is also provider of the source of life that makes his wife a mother.  He is head of the house because he is the source of life in every way. He must lay down his life daily in love of his wife and family. His wife depends on him for nourishment by the security of his love and devotion. She is in submission to him in that she supports and helps him in this mission of sacrificial love.

These beautiful images are strongly present to us at every Mass and provide an example of love God wishes to share with and through all of us as individual members of the Bride, the Church, as well as in our vocations.  And in certain ways, the love of Christ as bridegroom applies to both men and women in the marriage.

As human beings, however, we are prone to sin and are hopelessly weak and flawed. All too often our marriages are far from an example of Christ’s love for His Church.  Marriage can be much more difficult to live out than we assumed prior to marriage when love was full of enthusiasm and romance, and you seem invincible as a couple.  You are not married directly to Jesus, you are married to another sinner.

We can’t allow the example of marriage which Jesus left us to discourage or frustrate us. But we mustn’t think it impossible or unattainable. Difficult as it may be, marriage to another person can be lived out for a lifetime, and can bear witness to love of Christ for His Church. That witness is sacrificial love; putting the other first, accepting hardships, and ultimately the commitment to being united as one.

It’s an impossible task for human beings, but totally possible by the grace of God present to both individuals in marriage, as well as the marriage itself, offering supernatural strength where human strength is wanting or inadequate.  As Jesus is centralized and prioritized in the marriage, and both persons mutually work at it,  living out the marriage commitment is more realistic and desired, and certainly more joy-filled and blessed.

No one gets it perfectly right, thus no one has the perfect marriage or is the perfect spouse.  We all fail our spouse and our God at times. But we do have an example to observe, consider, and emulate every time we participate at the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass.  It’s worth the effort to consider the marriage ceremony we are fortunate to witness and participate in at every Mass. It takes two to love like this for a lifetime, but it takes a Christ-centered personal life to make it even remotely possible to follow the example of the Lamb.

Please check out this Marriage Of The Lamb series, and share it with others.  Hopefully, it will help you deepen your understanding of Christian marriage.

The Vow: a story of true love

About a month ago, I went to see the movie “The Vow” fully prepared for it to be an overall disappointment.  It certainly delivered, except for one scene that actually makes the movie worth seeing. The mother tells her upset daughter that she stayed with her husband after learning of his lengthy affair because she decided she was not going to punish him for his one mistake. She stayed with him because of all the things he did right, not the one thing he did wrong.

It was this powerful moment where marriage was defended with such heroism that inspired me to want to get the book written by the real couple to learn more.  Unfortunately, this situation never actually happened.  It turns out the real parents of the daughter were always happily married.

But I’m so glad I got the book and read the true story. What I discovered was an even greater defense of marriage.

First, this is a true story that’s hard for any of us to imagine.  Two months after Kim and Krickett Carpenter are married, Krickett is injured in a car accident that causes the loss of her memory to the point of not knowing who Kim is.  She has no recollection of their relationship at all.

Talk about never knowing what can happen. All single people and dating couples think they have the luxury of planning out their married lives.  But life is unpredictable, and God often has other plans.

Imagine having to approach life as a married woman with a man you do not know at all.  Imagine trying to live your married life with a woman who doesn’t know you, doesn’t want you, and doesn’t remember marrying you.

For better or for worse.  In sickness and in health.  These are the vows said at the wedding ceremony.  But that can’t apply to this situation, right?  The woman has no memory of you, and wants nothing to do with you.  You can’t force her to live out marriage with you.  Why stay?  She’s fine with you leaving.

Sadly, this is where many people get it wrong about the words of their vow and what their ultimate responsibility is.  Probably without knowing it, too many people enter into marriage with their own definition of what the words said in the vows mean, and put conditions on how far they will go in living such things as loving another through difficult situations.

Perhaps instead of vows, people would prefer a long contract that clearly defines terms and conditions.  “I will love you in sicknesses such as the common cold, the flu, broken limbs, fatal diseases; excluding such sicknesses as memory loss, depression, and addictions.”

Perhaps people want guarantees in this contract.  “I promise never to have anything happen to me that would change our standard of living or make you have to work.  I promise to never to lose my job, burn the dinner, allow the lawn to grow past three inches.  I promise never to change in any way that displeases you or make you unhappy.”

Sounds funny to have these kinds of conditions.  But for many people, love is conditional on these kinds of things.

Every couple says the same vows, but not every couple accepts the words at their fullest meaning and to their farthest extent.  Every couple has plans for their married life, but not every couple is willing to accept a disruption to those plans.

Kim and Krickett Carpenter enter their marriage with love and commitment. In both the film and in the true story, Kim Carpenter says he made a vow, and he loves her regardless.  She is his wife.  He promised to love her, even if she doesn’t love him.

Kim’s faith keeps him committed to the wife he loves and confident that God will work it out somehow, even when he felt he should let Krickett go and end the marriage.  Even more remarkable is that Krickett has complete recollection of God and her faith in Him.  She can’t remember anything about Kim, but her Christianity is in tact.  That goes to show that Christianity does not stem from the brain, but from the soul.

I couldn’t help but think how this could very well make the difference for a successful marriage.  It’s a matter of having the true faith rooted in the very being of person, and solidified through growth in truth and love for Christ.  Perhaps it is lack of Christian faith that makes one or both end a marriage.

Whatever it was, the story of Kim and Krickett Carpenter is remarkable in that they stayed together.  They did not have a marriage to build onto from Krickett’s view.  It was not romantic love full of deep feeling and friendship.  It was an act of the will based on circumstances that seemed obviously God-directed. Krickett realized that God allowed her to marry Kim for a reason, and that it was worth her being open to him.  They both started a new relationship and fell in love again, creating new memories and a new, renewed, commitment.

A new relationship.  That’s how you do it if there are no other options and you want to make it work.  The Carpenters both sincerely wanted it to work somehow, but could not find a way to make the old marriage work.  They made a new relationship because they believed in their marriage.  Most failing marriages don’t undergo such an extreme situation, but they have the same choice presented; namely, to make it work or end it.  Scrap the old relationship because it doesn’t work.  Establish a new relationship. Fall in love all over again.

Love can develop between two people who want it.  Love can grow between two people who see God’s will.  It can be the hard and rough road, but the pay off can be immeasurable.  Their relationship proves what it means to be “Christ-centered” both at the personal and the relationship level.  True Christians understand how God works.  They don’t want to run from His will, but rather run toward Him.

Sorry seems to be the hardest word

The association to being a Christian and a Catholic comes with a great personal responsibility. It is no doubt an expectation of those who know us to be a Christian that we act like one. This is a natural expectation.

People seem to lose the focus about what they expect from a Christian when it comes to forgiveness and mercy.  It’s more important that the Christian is expected to show mercy rather than they not commit sin.  To sin is human, but to forgive is Godly.  Jesus clearly prioritizes forgiveness in the Lord’s prayer: “forgive us our trespasses as we forgive those who trespass against us”.

Forgive me, but only in the measure that I forgive.  That is what Jesus taught us to pray.

Rather than focus here on the forgiver, I want to focus on the forgivee; the person who is seeking the forgiveness of Christ through the person they have offended. It’s a terrible thing for a person to “assume” they will be forgiven just because the person you’ve offended is a Christian. It may very well be that a Christian is expected to forgive, but YOU are expected to be truly sorry for what you have done.

As we continue in Lent and the spirit of fasting, it would be nice if we could see many people fasting from the empty apologies, or for those who find it hard to ask forgiveness to fast from the pride that keeps them from saying “I’m sorry” when it is called for.

First, there are those who constantly say they’re sorry. Perhaps they continue to do the same thing over and over, expecting the person they’ve repeatedly offended be there with, “That’s okay” after saying “sorry.” They have developed a way of life where doing things that upset someone is normal, and the forgiveness by that person expected. There is no end to this cycle of offenses because the person forgiving wants to forgive and move on, but the offender is not truly sorry.

When we’ve hurt someone, we need to be repair that damage. We need to feel sorrow and feel determined not to repeat our mistake.  We then need to confess what we’ve done, and make up for it. The fundamental penance is to change and make things better than they were.

In order for someone to take you seriously about your apology, the words must be backed up with action.

This is how we raise our children. You hit your brother? Say you’re sorry and give him a hug.

Perhaps the constant saying of “I’m sorry” is by one who finds the word “sorry” to be meaningless by also saying it for every little thing that happens that has no need of an apology. This is the overly polite sorrow.  You grab for the salt at the same time someone else goes for it and you say “Oh, I’m sorry, go ahead.” You come out of the mall with a friend toward your car and it’s raining and you say “Gosh, I’m sorry about this.”

You’re sorry.  Are you really sorry? For reaching for the salt? For making your friend walk to the car in the rain?  This is an abuse of the word sorry. I realize every one of us do it. But it is worth taking the time to observe ourselves and realize just how often we say “I’m sorry,” when there is nothing at all to be sorry for. It’s important because you want to be a person who when you say “I’m sorry,” you mean it.

Then there is the person who doesn’t say “I’m sorry.” As many times as they do something that warrants an apology, they will not. Whether they are purposely not saying it or have just developed the habit of not saying it, the result of refraining from saying “I’m sorry” has the same affect.  Even if you ARE sorry and act accordingly, it’s very important to work on saying the words.  It matters.

It’s better to have someone who takes action to repent but not apologize than someone who says they’re sorry but never makes the necessary changes.  But if you are a person who does not say the words, then you have to get in the habit of doing so.  It matters to the person you have offended to experience both the words “I’m sorry” and the actions to repent. Sincere apologies are an important vehicle for building trust.

Start now, today, examining your life in the “I’m sorry” department. How often or little do you say it?  When you do say it, do you mean it?  What is your track record of proving your sorrow after telling someone you are sorry?  How can someone know you are sorry?

This has to with sincerity.  Are you a sincere person?  Can your “I’m sorry” be trusted?  Ponder this and how this applies to your own life.

Sincere apologies, an effort toward reparation, and sincere forgiveness builds trust. Trust creates the foundation of true love.

Trust in relationships is not about an absolute arrival at trustworthiness, is about the building and rebuilding of trust via humility and acts of forgiveness. No one is perfect, and becoming a truly sincere person of sorrow takes time and practice.

We must always work on maintaining our trustworthiness. Apologizing with true contrition and a spirit of reparation is a gesture of restoring or proving how trustworthy we are.

Attachment in Human Love

Love between a man and a woman is one of the most beautiful things in the world. But what happens when the love with that person becomes the most important thing in your life?

There is nothing more natural than wanting to be loved. We need it. We need it from our parents and family as we grow up, and we need it as we interact socially as adults.

We all have a fundamental desire to be loved by at least one person who knows us and fulfills our every personal need. And with marital love, there is the additional need to be physically intimate to express love.

Though this need to be loved in every way (emotionally, affectionately, physically, spiritually) is completely natural, it also poses a danger to our eternal salvation that must be considered. That danger is attachment to the person or persons who love us and whom we love.

What is wrong we being attached to someone you love? Doesn’t attachment come with the territory of love? Yes and no. Yes, you become attached to someone you love in a way you cannot help, which compels a real commitment to that person, not easily broken. To call someone “friend” assumes a promise to have a dedication to that person because of who they are and your decision to love them.

For those who have experience attachment to someone in love that lasts a lifetime, there is a fulfillment in this world that is a gift. Not too many find it. The reality is that human relationships can end, regardless of the intention to love each other no matter what and for life. Friendships end, engagements are broken, marriages go through separation or divorce.

Everyone in any relationship assumes that it will never die. No one enters into a marriage thinking anything other than they are going to be one of the fortunate ones that make it until death. But when there is an end to a relationship, there is often a certain level of death inside, sometimes known as a broken heart.

Everyone experiences love uniquely to themselves. Therefore, no one can know for certain how another person will grow in love or handle the end of love. No matter how love is handled in good times or bad times, attachment to the person is the reason for the things we do in the name of love or the end of love with that person.

In this sense, attachment is dangerous. When we rely too much on the love of someone, we not only risk getting hurt by them (obviously and understandably), but we also may have gone too far and deified that person. In other words, we just might have made this person our god and savior. This person is now the pinnacle of our existence, with nothing or no one above them.

To assign another human being that much importance in our life, to the point of having no one else above them, is to set yourself up for disaster.

Have you gotten too attached to the person you love? Perhaps you have. In one sense, how can you help it? You love them so intensely, so deeply, so completely, you cannot imagine your life without them. This is beautiful, and there’s nothing wrong with it. But you have to pay attention to that part where you feel you something like not being able to live without the person.

Life is a gift from God. It is God who is to be our God, and the primary person of our affection. He made you out of nothing. He loves you more than any human being could possibly love you. He desires you to be with Him for all eternity, providing you His love and grace through your entire life in order to accomplish this purpose.

Who in this world can be more important than God? Who has a right to your love above your Creator and Father in Heaven? You will emphatically tell me “No one!”, and mean it. I believe you. Why shouldn’t I? I think everyone who believes in God believes they love God above all things.

But in practice, I think all of us are susceptible to self-deception when it comes to the place of God verses the place of our husband/wife, boyfriend/girlfriend, fiance, best friend, parent, sibling, etc. Our affections toward certain human beings we love are powerful. And the power of love shared by two human beings has a way influencing the place of God. Thus human persons replaces the Divine Person as the one we love most.

Have you ever broken down and cried when you committed a sin or while in Confession? Most do not. But many tears are shed when a spouse dies or the person you date breaks up with you. It’s painful to suffer the loss of human love, but doesn’t seem too painful to suffer the loss of friendship with God in sin.

This is not proof that we don’t love God above all, but it should make us think. And we should never cease asking as we examine our consciences if we have put the person we love before God.

What happens inside is very telling. And we should pay attention to it. Does the love we have for another make us think, do, or feel something that is not in accordance with God’s will? Are my reactions and emotions toward a person I love out of context to God’s plan or the teachings of the Church?

If we are honest about our examination and do it in the light of Jesus Christ, we just might have an inappropriate attachment to someone. What would make it inappropriate? If the love we have for that person influences us to think or act in a way that is contrary to God’s will and the natural order created by God. Or if we do something associated with that loved one with a selfish motive, rather than motivated by love for God.

Jesus said, “If you love me, keep my commandments,” “love others as I have loved you,” “no greater love does one have than to lay down his life for a friend.” Obeying God, serving others, putting another’s need before our own, sacrificing for another even to the point of death for their sake. These are ways we love God before any human person.

You must learn detachment. The person you date and marry already has a God. They need only a suitable partner in love to share and help each other on the path toward that same God. Do not get so attached to that love that you lose yourself without that person.

God and His love can never be lost to us. God alone quenches love’s thirst. Human beings can only love as they are living Christ’s love. But human love fails. And human affection cannot be preferred to doing God’s will. Love God first, and human love will flow proportionally and without contradiction to the love of God.

Enjoy the human love relationships God provides in your life. But never expect any human being to fulfill your desire for love and to be loved. Only God can do that. As St. Augustine said, “Our hearts are restless till they rest in Thee.”

Just give me a hug.

If you don’t know the power of a hug, then you are probably not having much success in your relationships.

To hug is to heal. To be hugged is to be healed. To not hug is to deprive.

I am not exaggerating when I say that hugs have the power to convert. A person having the worst day of their lives can be instantly restored to peace and contentment when they receive a hug from one who loves and cares for them. A miserable person can muster up a smile when they are hugged with love and sincerity.

People who do not get hugged often are at risk of becoming miserable people. A hugless existence is a deprived existence. The hugless come to fear the world and become defensive, suspicious, frightened people.

To be hugged is to know that everything is going to be okay. A great hug from one who loves you makes you feel as if all the cares of the world melt away.

What is it about a hug that gives it that much power?

Couples who argue need to learn how to recognize when a hug is in order. Many harmful fights could easily be nipped in the bud or avoided all together if one would have reached out and hugged the other.

A good hugger is an observant person. They recognize when a hug is needed. They can see past the outward antagonism and courageously approach the person. A hug can defuse the bomb that was trying to go off.

Hugging is proactive and heroic. It takes courage and humility to offer a hug, especially when it might not seem desired or if you don’t feel like it.

A good hugger loves to offer hugs even when they don’t seem to be needed. They know that everyone can use a hug. You don’t have to wait until there is a reason to hug.

Who doesn’t need a hug? We all do. If there were more hugging and less talking, people would be much more pleasant and balanced.

Hugs can be enough. They can still off passions from arousing in two people who are dating. Hugs are a strong sign of affection that an unmarried couple growing in love need and which can help prevent unchaste signs of affection meant for marriage. Hugs are enough because they make the other feel loved and make the growing bond stronger, all in a chaste way.

Hug for God’s sake. The embrace of Jesus Christ most present to us through another human being is the hug. When those are arms wrap around you and you are pressed close to the hugger with sincerity and caring, you experience the feeling of the love of God.

One of my favorite pictures of Jesus is the one where you see Jesus fully embracing the person with a major hug. Jesus’ eyes are closed and He is smiling big. He is clearly sincerely happy to be with that person. His hug is full of welcome and unconditional love. You just know that no matter what the person has done, Jesus loves the person. Period.

What a gift we all have to give to another, especially the people we love. It costs nothing to obtain nor to give, but what it accomplishes is priceless and greater than anything that could be bought and given.

What an opportunity we all have! Any person with a pair of arms and generosity in their hearts can give this tremendous gift to another person. No one can claim ignorance of not knowing what to do for someone in need. A hug can be given, and it is much.

Do we even realize how much a hug is worth to another? Ask anyone who is hugged what it is worth and they will tell you it means the world. Ask anyone who gives hugs and they will tell you it serves them just as much as it serves the one they hug. For a hug has an affect on both simultaneously.

There is no such thing as a one-dimensional hug. No one can hug with only the one being hugged benefiting. The hugger cannot help but be affected. At the very least, they are closer to God who transmits love through the hugger to the person hugged.

I grew up in a hugging environment. Italians are big on hugging, so I am a hugger, and have no problem hugging a complete stranger. There is something about hugging that makes people feel immediately welcomed.

There are people who do not like to be touched at all, and therefore find being hugged uncomfortable or offensive. They are also very likely not huggers themselves. I don’t pass any judgment on them, but I do feel sad for those who dismiss hugging as something not too important in the scheme of relationships.

I can only challenge people to try it. Become a hugger and see what happens. This includes your dating experiences. Hug the people you date as you date them. You will find less of a need to act on sexual impulses. But you will also find that mutual hugging to be quite the method of growing in love for one another. You will grow to realize just how much you depend on those hugs to heal each other, thus learning one major aspect of how you can serve each other as Christ to one another.

You should also practice hugging when you have conflict. You will learn more and more how to address what is wrong not by battling things out in words, but by defusing the mounting negative emotions by hug communication.

It is so true that sometimes a person just needs to be hugged when they are upset, not battled or pressed on how to solve the problem or talked to in a patronizing way. Just hug them and without words show them that it will be okay.

If you are not a hugger, you need to become one. Hugging is a love requirement. You cannot survive marriage without giving and receiving hugs. Best to learn the art of hugging before you are a married person so you are ready for the great mission of healing, being Jesus Christ to your spouse via your loving and sincere embrace.

If you are already married, then it’s never too late. Just start hugging. And don’t worry about being hugged. Though you need hugs too, start by being a hugger. Chances are good your spouse will quickly start wanting to hug you.

Finally, no matter what relationships you have, don’t be afraid to ask for a hug from someone you need it from. It is highly unlikely that person will deny you your request. And the dividends paid by your courageous decision to ask for a hug are astronomical.

Everyone can use a hug. Just give it them. When in in doubt about what to do for a troubled person, give them a hug. Don’t be afraid to hug. It is one of most important medicinal forces we have this side of heaven that can fulfill the Lord’s command to “love one another as I have loved you.”

Love is not enough. Charity matters.

So just how selfish of a person are you? Answer: Very. Don’t worry, it’s not just you. We all are.

Without a realization and admission of selfishness in your life, you lack the true charity required to successfully live out marital love. Therefore, your dating efforts are extremely risky.

I say “true charity” because there is an excessive, and an all too often undetected, amount of false charity. Many believe this is a well developed virtue of charity, when it is actually selfishness. This false sense of charity is the cause of many breakups of couples who are otherwise perfectly fine together.

Most love in dating and courtship starts with the feelings of love. We are happy to do things that benefit you or make you feel loved, as long as I am happy to do it and get something in return.

Charity is necessary for authentic love to be lived out. Love is sacrificial, stemming from will, and requiring actions purely for the benefit of another. But it is also stems from feelings and emotions that assist the will to be more readily willing to give to the other, while at the same time gaining benefit for the self.

A sacrifice, by definition, cannot include a personal benefit to self. It is a pure action toward the benefit of another, with nothing in it for yourself, and typically accompanying some kind of suffering (which, by definition, is a negative thing).

Charity is sacrifice. Voluntary sacrifice, to be exact. True charity is selfless, therefore, often painful or difficult, but it is also a deliberate decision. You have a choice, and the recipient of the charity is not entitled to your charitable act.

Charity is not a man holding the door open for a woman. That’s just courtesy and gentlemanly behavior, which fosters development of charity. Charity is not taking your sick child to the emergency room at 3:00am. That is sacrificial and does not feel good, for sure, and does come close to charity, but duty requires you to act in this situation. To do it is expected, and to not act is a sin, as well as harmful to the sick child.

Giving a drunk friend the only cash you have to get home for his cab fare to get safely home is charity. Tolerating an irritable boyfriend or girlfriend while on a date without letting it annoy you because of the time you set aside for it and the money you are spending, but rather being sincerely patient and accepting is charity. Giving up your night out with friends, which you were looking forward to, in order to stay home with your spouse who had a bad day and needs comforting, is charity.

Charity does not have to be on a “save the world” scale, as you can see by these examples. In fact, charity is most often in the little things. They are the every day opportunities presented to us by God through the people in our lives. These little acts of charity, done without resentment, develop the habit of sacrificial love which preps the person for larger acts of charity. The action was not required, but knowing it benefits another, you decide to do it. Voluntarily. Without any benefit to yourself.

The misconception about charity, especially for people claiming pious religious practice, is that we must be feel happy about the act of charity and display that outwardly. No! To have charity does not require it is accompanied by feelings of delight and enthusiasm, with all smiles and gladness. Charity is sacrifice. It accomplishes the goal of the selfless act intended, despite any feeling about it.

But charity done with joy gives the act more power, specifically to convert another. People are affected by witnessing someone doing charitable acts with joy. Because joy in sacrifice goes against nature. This is where love is not enough. Charity matters to prove authentic love is alive. Typical romantic love is selfish because there is pleasure in the acts of love, and often pleasant actions are returned from the beloved. True charity, done with joy, provides a benefit to the other and a peace within the giver because they have chosen to do something selfless for God’s sake.

This is the secret of true charity; namely, that it is done for love of God alone. God calls us to love our neighbor, love our enemy, do good to those who persecute or hate you, love as Jesus loved. Perhaps there is a selfishness in true charity if you consider that you want to please God in your action. If that is your desire, then please God, let there be more selfishness like this in the world!

The act of love that hurts, that truly sacrifices something, that is done voluntarily, and finds pleasure in the sacrifice because of the knowledge of pleasing God in the process, is true charity. True charity has unlimited power to produce grace in others that are directly or indirectly affected by the act done with joy.

Mother Teresa of Calcutta is a shining example. The beam on her face as she picked up the downtrodden of the streets and lived a life of poverty is the essence of charity.

But marriage itself is a form of charity. Think about it. If entered correctly, there is a desire to serve the other out of love for them, in the name of love for God. Often, love demands service regardless of whether love is returned. That is charity. This kind of love can endure for life when we know that the affection we all desire comes from Christ, Who showers us with affectionate grace when human affection is wanting.

Those who are dating need to develop an awareness and be conscious of charity in action with those they date, and how they themselves are charitable as they date others. The distraction of romantic love very strong. This love is not enough. There is still too much of a “what’s in it for me” reality to this kind of love. Learn how to step back and observe little acts of charity from your prospects for marriage, and reflect on your post-date acts of charity. Have you both been a witness to Christ in true charity? Do you display a genuine concern for the other’s well-being first before your own selfish desires?

You should want to be someone your future spouse can feel safe with, knowing that their happiness is your happiness. You should want someone who feels the same about your happiness. False charity would pit you both against each other to see who can be more charitable, and cause problems that can kill an otherwise wonderful, and God-intended union. False charity is a selfish desire to do good for the other, and resents when not able to do so and in the manner desired.

True charity is detached from any pleasure in doing what is beneficial for another. It’s voluntary. It doesn’t count costs. It accepts what is painful. Live true charity. Then you will be living true love that makes for successful marriage.

“Love is patient, love is kind. It is not jealous, is not pompous, it is not inflated. It is not rude. It does not seek its own interests. It is not quick-tempered. It does not brood over injury. It does not rejoice over wrongdoing but rejoices with the truth. It bears all things, believes all things, hopes all things, endures all things.”
These are the words of St. Paul in 1 Corinthians. They are the very embodiment of charity.

Imitation of the Holy Family

This is the time of year when Christians are most focused on the Holy Family of Jesus, Mary and Joseph. Reflection on the Holy Family is more than just the Nativity scene. Naturally, Christmas focuses on the birth of the Saviour, and Mary and Joseph play key roles in this most important event. The Child born in Bethlehem in a stable is, no doubt, what Christmas is all about.

But there is a reason the Church incorporates a feast day of the Holy Family within the days of Christmas. There is much to reflect on in addition to the historic event of Jesus’ birth. The Church wants us to have this opportunity.

For singles, the Holy Family represents what they hope to have in their own lives; a loving, caring spouse and children. Holy means to be set apart. They are the “Holy” Family because of the unique purpose each was called to do together. What can we learn from the Holy Family as we endeavor to be married and have a family?

Consider the parenting of Mary and Joseph, and the environment they created for their Child to be raised in.

Just as Jesus had no need of baptism, yet allowed himself to be baptized as an example to us, He had no need to be formed as a person by His earthly parents, yet submitted Himself to them in all things. It is in this submission to Mary and Joseph that He was full prepared for His mission of saving the world.

We start out as an infant and are completely at the mercy of our parents to form us into the person we were created to be. Without good parenting, we are at risk of NOT becoming who we were meant to be, but rather some distorted version of that person. Thus, if we are neglected, abused, unloved, poorly educated, misguided, or many other things that fall under bad parenting, we do not turn out to be what society would call a “good person,” nor what the Church would call a “Christian.”

Parenting matters in the formation of every child to becoming a healthy, virtuous, civil adult of good character. The parents we have and the environment we grow up in play major roles in our becoming the person we are as an adult.

Therefore, it is no small matter to choose a spouse whom we believe will make a good parent, and who desires to establish a home environment that will give children the best opportunity to become the person they are each created to be by God. And you should be this person, too, for it is the kind of person your future spouse is seeking.

Here is where we can turn to the Holy Family for a universal example. The home of Jesus, Mary and Joseph was a peaceful, harmonious home, full of joy and simplicity of life. It was a stable environment, where mutual love and respect was a priority. Jesus was taught normal things and guided by His mother and father. His human will was developed to confirm with God’s will. There was no place for anger, aggression, and dominance of one over another in their home. Jesus was able to grow up with real freedom of self-discovery.

Jesus had two parents who were on the same page. They both loved God and their religion was central to their lives. The teachings of their religion governed their daily actions. They taught their son to love God and follow the teachings of their faith. Mary and Joseph were consistent and without controversy when it came to everything important. Therefore, a husband and wife should be striving after these same things.

It is important to find someone who believes in peace and is a person of good will. It is so critical to a happy and healthy home. It’s critical to authentic love, which should always (and I mean always) be seeking peace and resolve. A person of good will has the other’s best interest in mind. Even if there are times of conflict, the end result should be a desire to make peace. The home should be where love and forgiveness are lived.

From the environment of peace and good will comes well adjusted children who make the transition into adulthood with a firm sense of who they are, and the confidence to seek out what it is they are to do. They were free to become the person they were created to be. Their parents did not try to control them in their transition, but guided them through with the freedom to discover themselves.

The environment a couple raises their children in influences who they become. It’s a concerning thing to see households where everyone is so busy “doing,” and parents who have their children busy achieving and participating. It is an environment that is fast paced and cluttered with activity, anxiety, pressure, excessive entertainment, etc. There is a place for these things, but we must be careful about the home environment being counter-productive.

We don’t know if Jesus was ever on the honor role, or won awards in athletics, etc. But we do know He led a humble, simple, and predictable life obedient to Mary and Joseph. The message seems to be that what is important in the vocation to marriage and life as a family is simplicity, and is very attainable for all. It is a serenity that comes from within with God at the heart.

Above all, the Holy Family prayed. Therefore, a couple should be praying for each other, as well as with each other. Without this cornerstone, the entire structure falls. Those who believe in peace and are people of good will are definitely people of prayer. So make sure you consider the prayer life of the person you are considering for marriage.

St. Augustine defined peace as “the tranquility of order.” To have an ordered life with God as the head and center of all things will ensure the peace that is so critical to living the meaning of Christmas all year round.

May the peace and good will that was at the heart of the life of the Holy Family be the priority of all who seek love, marriage, and family life.

Your relationship deserves a good home

“With the Lord, there is mercy and fullness of redemption.” This responsorial psalm is derived from Psalm 130, which has the trembling words “If Thou, O Lord, should mark iniquities, who could stand?” In other words, if You keep a record of sins, who could ever make it to heaven?

How true. We are committed to not sinning, yet we sin. God is first merciful because we all sin, despite our desire and efforts not to. We don’t deserve His mercy, but He grants it freely and always. We don’t deserve redemption, but God desires us to be redeemed.

God’s foremost posture with us is mercy.

As a Christian, I am mandated to be the same. I must insert myself in these words of the Psalm, so that it can be said by anyone about me: “With Anthony, there is mercy and fullness of redemption.” And so must all of you. Can you honestly say “everyone finds mercy with me?”

What is true love or deep friendship between two people if there is not foremost a posture of mercy between them? It is a house of straw. When the Big Bad Wolf comes along, he need only blow it down to get to the three little pigs. So it is with couples or friends who have problems and allow the strong winds that shake their relationship to tear down the home they have built.

In my view, the idea of being home is the essence of what love is. This is why you feel you are home as long as you are with the person you love, no matter where you both are. Or why you long to get back to that person when you are apart from them. That is home.

This sense of home is one of profound safety, warmth, comfort, and peace. It is a firm knowledge that no effort of the Big Bad Wolf can blow down your house. Your whole being rests because no matter what happens, the foundation of the home is mercy and forgiveness. Your human condition to fail is accepted and welcome.

Isn’t this ultimately what heaven is to be? Heaven is our only true and lasting home. Our time on this earth is a brief one, but it requires us having opportunity to experience this eternal home while in this world in order to help us be fashioned into the saints we are to become.

Our entire life on earth is as a sinner trying to become a saint. But too many people want us to be saints at all times without much (if any) room for failure. For many who are dating and seeking the right person, they seem to always come up short because ultimately, they discover that the people they date are flawed or have too much potential to hurt them.

God, of course, is the only one who can fulfill this high expectation. God is pure love and incapable of anything that is not good for us. Yet, we still foolishly pursue finding in another person what only God can give. God is home. With Him you find complete safety, security, warmth, welcome, comfort and peace. With human beings, not so much.

However, we are called to be like God, and we are provided the grace to do so. Unfortunately, I think too many take this call to mean that we must never sin. It’s clear that God is realistic about us and knows we will and do sin, or else Jesus would never have bothered instituting the beautiful Sacrament of Reconciliation. When we go to Confession, our sins are obliterated and we are given a clean slate.

How many of us can say we do that for those who hurt us? That we are so like God that we provide mercy to all who wrong us? This is the aspect of being like God that is much more attainable to us than the living without sin. Being merciful to others.

Jesus taught us to ask God to forgive us our trespasses as we forgive those who trespass against us. In other words, don’t bother forgiving me, Lord, until I first forgive others. He also taught us in the Beatitudes that “blessed are the merciful, for they shall obtain mercy.”

It is mercy that is the heart of the law of love, because it is the heart of God’s essence. Essentially, God loves us so much that He welcomes us home, just as Jesus taught with the Prodigal Son.

Home is where the heart is. That saying is correct. I would specific that it is where the Heart of Christ is. As we fuse our heart to the Heart of Christ, we live a love that makes us attractive, welcoming, home.

The misunderstanding about modern dating and those who seek to find love is that people want to find someone who makes them feel good and never hurts them. The truth is they are seeking to find home; a place where they can be who they are and not have to worry about their inevitable moments of failure and sin. They want to find that love of God in the person they desire to give themselves to.

Sadly, because they cannot find someone who is first merciful, they cannot find home, and they settle for what they can get in all manner of distorted views of love. Thus, we have a disaster of bad relationships, bad marriages, bad friendships.

Every person deserves a good home. When they fall or sin or hurt someone, they need mercy though they may not deserve it. In the second part of this reflection on what it means to be merciful in relationships, I will address the problem of being too hurt to be merciful and be that home, the harm that comes from rejecting the call to mercy, and how this ultimately applies to finding and living true love.

In the meantime, meditate on the words of the Psalm, “With the Lord, there is mercy and fullness of redemption” and where it says “the Lord” insert your own name, and consider with Jesus how true this is when it comes to your dealings with others.

The roles of men and women

I have to laugh a bit as I write this article responding to the feedback of last week’s article, responding to a previous article, responding to the feedback from a previous article.

I received many requests for a dating job description for women. I believe this was addressed in the “Finding a good woman: from God’s point of view” article, which focuses on what the Bible states makes up a good wife as mentioned in Sirach 26. The list I made for men who are dating is actually very attainable if they decide these are truths as to what a man should be and do as they are dating a woman and want love and marriage. The list in Sirach is also very attainable for women of truth.

You’ve seen what the Bible outlines about how a wife should be. Let’s give you a good laugh and show you what Housekeeping Monthly magazine says you should be. Here is a list called “The Good Wife’s Guide” as published in 1955:

  1. Have dinner ready. Have a delicious meal ready on time for his return. This is a way of letting him know that you have be thinking about him and are concerned about his needs.
  2. Prepare yourself. Take 15 minutes to rest so you’ll be refreshed when he arrives. Touch up your make-up, put a ribbon in your hair and be fresh-looking.
  3. Be a little more interesting for him. His boring day may need a lift and one of your duties is to provide it.
  4. Clear away the clutter. Make one last trip through the main part of the house just before your husband arrives. Run a dust cloth over the tables.
  5. Help him unwind. During the cooler months of the year you should prepare and light a fire for him to unwind by. Your husband will feel he has reached a haven of rest and order, and it will give you a lift too. After all, catering to his comfort will provide you with immense personal satisfaction.
  6. Minimize all noise. At the time of his arrival, eliminate all noise of the washer, dryer or vacuum.
  7. Encourage the children to be quiet.
  8. Be happy to see him.
  9. Greet him with a warm smile and show sincerity in your desire to please him.
  10. Listen to him. You may have a dozen important things to tell him, but the moment of his arrival is not the time. Let him talk first – remember, his topics of conversation are more important than yours.
  11. Don’t greet him with complaints and problems.
  12. Don’t complain if he’s late for dinner. Count this as minor compared to what he might have gone through at work. Make him comfortable.
  13. Have him lean back in a comfortable chair or lie him down in the bedroom. Have a cool or warm drink ready for him.
  14. Arrange his pillow and offer to take off his shoes. Speak in a low, soothing and pleasant voice.
  15. Don’t ask him questions about his actions or question his judgment or integrity. Remember, he is the master of the house and as such will always exercise his will with fairness and truthfulness. You have no right to question him.

A good wife always knows her place.

This list for women is hilarious and certainly dated. Some would say that this is a recipe for being a doormat and has only encouraged women to be taken advantage of by abusive men.

But before you roll your eyes and dismiss this list completely, consider that this is how women lived for generations. There are some fundamental principles that do apply to a God inspired, truth seeking woman who wants marriage in this day and age. If you think closely about this list, it is role-driven. All fifteen items are tasks, with the conclusion that a wife knows her place. The husband is the master of the home, the wife is the subordinate.

Marriage does require a man and woman having and fulfilling roles and duties. These roles and duties serve each other and the family. If the motive is service to and happiness of the other, these roles and duties are effortless.

Perhaps what needs to be acknowledged by dating Christians is their need to know the qualities of a good spouse ahead of time and the ability to recognize them in yourself and the other.

For example, a man focused on marrying a woman who gives him visual and physical pleasure, or a woman who wants to get married before it’s too late to have children, is going to distort the ability to know and recognize the more important things that makes for marital love and unity.

This is not to discount a man’s desire for physical attraction in a woman or a woman’s desire to have children. These are perfectly natural things. However, it is risky to prioritize them and discount the more important things.

While you are dating, you need to see the person interact with you and see proof that they are striving to become who they are called to be. It is the desire to be a good person that makes up much of the belief that they will be a good spouse.

Men who work all day come home tired. A woman who is a homemaker works hard all day, tends to the kids, prepares dinner, and is also tired. Who is the one who is the priority to be taken care of? Should the wife make sure the house is quiet so her husband has time to unwind? Or should a man take over when he gets home and give his wife a much needed break?

It’s all in the attitude. Men should take a minute to prepare before getting home by getting calm, putting work matters aside, and reconfigure to his family. If he has kids, he has to know they are going to want to jump all over him when he arrives. So prepare for the noise. Women, don’t say you are off the clock as soon as he walks in. That stresses him out and makes matters worse.

If two people are in love, they desire to serve each other. This is a very important thing to recognize in order to decide if you should get married. Do they allow pressures, stresses, concerns, desires, wants, needs, etc., to take the priority and make you feel guilty for anything you are going through? Or does he or she rise above those things in order to help you and show interest in knowing how they can make you happier?

There is no need to become a doormat for the other and allow the relationship to be one-sided in the efforts to serve. That is no good. But considering what the roles and duties are of a man and woman, of husband and wife, of mother and father, should absolutely be a part of the dating process. Do not marry someone who has not proved their quality during the dating process as it pertains to their roles as men and women, as husbands and wives.

Gay marriage: the price of contraception?

New York’s legalization of gay marriage certainly has many people upset.

I was recently interviewed on a radio program, and a caller starting talking about gay marriage with great anger and wanted to know what I thought of New York’s action.

What can one really say about gay marriage that is not already known? We explain what the natural law and Christian doctrine equally teach about what marriage is and how homosexuals can never, by definition, be married. Yet, legalized gay marriage is happening at the state level. Are we really so surprised? What can be more obvious to any human being alive that the pregnancy in a woman is actually a human being who has a right to life. Yet, we’ve had national legalized abortion for over thirty years.

Many things are being legalized and accepted in this country, and in fact all over the world, that are immoral. But you are dealing with people who don’t think “morality.” I wonder if they think at all. There is nothing natural or moral about a man’s genitalia being inserted in an anus (male or female) for sexual pleasure. A man should never make his wife do this, and it goes without saying that two men doing this is immoral. I fear that perhaps legislators are either paid off handsomely to ignore what is morally right and do what is selfishly profitable, or they can relate to homosexuals because they have or want such sexual activities with a woman. Whatever the reason, they will not be persuaded by logic, reason, or religious principles.

Homosexuals want their relationships to be recognized legally. They want their immoral and unnatural sexual activity to be “above board”. Legislators, who are supposed to be representing public opinion, are basically saying we all are to accept the perversion of sexuality.

Is there really a common desire to pursue truth with these people that make us capable of arguing and teaching our way to correcting these problems? Sometimes I wonder if Christians have forgotten that there are some evils that are beyond our efforts to speak out or to take action against.

St. Matthew and St. Mark both give the account of the father whose son is possessed by a devil. The father calls out to the Lord to have pity because his son is a lunatic who throws himself into fire and water. Jesus is disturbed that his disciples lacked the faith to drive out this devil. They ask why they could not drive it out. Jesus says “Because of your unbelief”; that faith as a grain of mustard seed can do the impossible. “But this kind is not cast out but by prayer and fasting.”

If anything fits into this category it is the insanity of legalized immoralities such as abortion and gay marriage.

Perhaps it is the internal moral decay of this nation (and this world) that is the cause of these things. It is possible for God to hold back His grace in the face of so much defiance and sin. But perhaps it is the unbelief and lack of prayer and fasting of those of us who profess to be Christian that explains legalized gay marriage and abortion.

Whatever the cause, we need some serious prayer and fasting efforts.

St. Augustine watched as his beloved Roman civilization fell primarily from the same kind of internal moral corruption our country has adopted. As brilliant as he was, he was not able to convince the powers that be to turn from their evil direction. There was no universal call of the Church for prayer or fasting for Rome. And there was no Rosary at that time.

Contrast that to Pope Pius V, who called on every Christian to pray the Rosary during the 16th century Turkish invasion that threatened Christianity itself. He believed only Our Lady’s intercession could bring about that victory.

Christians should be praying the Rosary and fasting extensively. Above all, they should really “believe” in God, with a great faith. The more who are doing this (truly, if the entire Christian world were doing this), it can be the most effective way to end these abominations. We have to at least start with ourselves. Our Rosaries and fasts will help some.

Now I would like to offer something to think about (and it is just a theory) as to why legalized gay marriage is happening.

I wonder if the ever rising priority of romantic love is responsible for this. “We love each other” is the reason homosexuals believe they have a right to get married. Heterosexuals marry for romantic love, so why shouldn’t a gay couple? States in America are agreeing with them. Why? Because marriage seems to have become about the affect aspect of love (feelings, attraction, sexual desire).

This is where, for heterosexuals, the purpose of marriage it is supposed to be about much more. Infallible Catholic teaching (via Canon Law) states that the purpose of marriage is for the mutual love of the spouses AND the procreation and education of children. A couple is to vow permanence, fidelity, and to being open to life.

This is heart of marital love; the establishment of a safe and loving environment for the children that come from their union. A gay couple can have strong feelings and desires for each other, and even make a life long commitment to each other, but they absolutely cannot have natural children.

The purpose of sexual impulse and attraction is to lead two people to first a life long commitment to each other, and then the establishment of a family though their generosity of being open to new life; the very external sign of their love.

From this focus on just the feelings and desires of the passions has come the use of contraception. The 20th century saw a major shift from this kind of responsible love and purpose of marriage, to a self-centered love that focuses solely on pleasure. The use of contraception has changed the game. It has taken children out of the equation. Couples enter into marriage wanting to use contraception, even Catholics, thinking it is okay to put off being open to children so they can “get to know each other.”

In my view, the contraceptive mentality and over-emphasized romantic love have paved the way for legalized gay marriage. But the feelings of love is not enough to ensure a capability to fulfill marriage vows of permanence, fidelity and being open to life. There is a need for the return of responsible love and marriage that is family-centered to de-throne pleasure-centered love that blocks life through contraception.

Rosary prayer warriors, dedicated fastors, devoted Eucharistic adorers are needed, in my view, to provide the real fire power to end anything opposed to love and marriage as God has designed it.

A lesson in love from mythology

It is a nightly ritual in my house that I read a story to my two youngest girls and then a story to my four boys. We all look forward to this very much. So between 7:00 to 8:00 pm, it’s story time. The girls love the fairy tales or things like the Beezus and Ramona series. The boys like the classic adventure and fantasy stories.

When we don’t have the usual time for the story we are reading, I will read a short story of some kind, like classic mythology. Recently, we had a short story evening and I read a myth called “Baucis and Philemon.” I’m sure many of you know this myth about this elderly couple named Baucis and Philemon who are visited by the Gods Jupiter and Mercury, who were trying to discover if the rumors of the cruel treatment of strangers were true.

The love of this couple is very striking and I would like to share with you segments of this very brief story, and then expound on it a bit. It’s actually quite a tear-jerker.

Jupiter and Mercury disguised themselves as weary travelers and knocked on many doors of this village, only to be turned away and treated rudely by all except for the elderly couple, Baucis and Philemon. They reached the “very humble cottage” of the elderly couple, which was very small and ordinary, with “precious little property within the posts of its fence.” The couple is described as follows:

“They were very, very poor, but also very contented and happy. Their cottage was separate from the village, just as they were, for in spite of their poverty, they never turned any stranger from their door nor failed to offer anyone in need what little they had for themselves. They had married young and they had grown old together in that very cottage. Throughout their lives they retained their steadfast love and admiration for each other, such that neither was a master or a servant in their home – they were equally masters and servants together.”

Jupiter and Mercury are taken in by the couple and are provided with a modest meal of olives, a few grapes, bread and milk with sweet honey. As the milk pitcher was always full despite all the drinking, the couple realizes these are not ordinary strangers, “but they were too polite to question them about the miracles.” The strangers are offered the bed of the couple, while they slept on the hard floor.

The next day, the gods reveal their identity. Startled, the couple drop to their knees in fear before them. Jupiter commands them to rise and comforts them for what they have done. He shows them what he has done to the rest of the village in punishment. They were the only people left in the village. In place of their humble cottage, Jupiter builds a temple of gold with beautiful gardens. He then asks the couple to tell him what they most desire so he can grant it to them.

Here is where it gets even more beautiful and astonishing:

“But we have our love for each other, and we’re already perfectly happy, so what more could we want?” says Philemon (the husband). Jupiter insisted; and after the couple discussed it further, they said: “Though we are happy, yet we are old and must expect someday to be parted from each other. Is it too much to ask, gracious lord, that we be allowed to be guardians of your beautiful temple, and when it comes our time to leave this world for the Land of Shades, that we may die in the same hour, still full of love as we have ever been, and depart this life together?”

Jupiter quickly replied, “It shall be just as you ask. You shall dwell together for many more happy years and your hearts shall always remain young and full of love; and when death shall come at last – as come it must – you shall depart together to the Land of Shades.”

Oh my goodness, how beautiful is that? But if you can believe it, there is more:

“So Baucis and Philemon grew very, very old, serving Jupiter all the while by welcoming every weary wayfarer and by feeding every poor beggar who came past that way. And so full of love were they for each other that in the eyes of Philemon, Baucis was still as beautiful as she was in her youth, and in the eyes of Baucis, Philemon was still as handsome as when he had fist wooed her so many years ago.”

Wooed! Who uses that word anymore? But they should. And how romantic that these very old people have a love so deep that they still look upon each other with youthful attraction, not out of courtesy nor necessity, but genuinely. But there is still more. Are you ready for this?:

“And then, at last, sitting side by side at the temple door at sunset, they passed from this mortal world at the same time, and Mercury, the messenger of the gods, conducted their gentle spirits to the Land of Shades. In their place, on either side of the temple door, rose an oak tree and a linden, their branches intertwined as though they were whispering loving secrets to each other. The people of the area still point out the place where the trees stand, side by side, forever intertwined, and they call them Baucis and Philemon.”

As romantic as all get out, no? Yes! What poetry! And what an image. Their branches intertwined as though whispering loving secrets to each other. My word, that is so beautiful. And what a testimonial of love, that it can be compared as two trees so intertwined that they are inseparable forever.

This myth speaks for itself as to what true love really is, and how beautiful marriage can be, where both are masters and servants of each other for the sake of the other. Where they live a content life of togetherness regardless of possessions, entertainment, or events; where mutual love and admiration is central; where a quiet and peaceful coexistence has value and meaning, like tea leaves slowly and quietly steeping with hot water to create something that is so unique that it has its own name.

I don’t know the details of how Philemon wooed Baucis, nor how they came to know such devotion to each other and importance to have each other’s company, nor what it was about the other that could have been so attractive. But one thing seems evidently clear; their love was founded on mutual respect, self-giving, love of life, and charity toward others. They lived outside of themselves, and they both found someone who wanted to give of themselves to one person for the other’s sake.

May we all find such a love that when both are old and gray, there is genuine youthful beauty still observed by the eye and within the heart.

When you can’t forget the past.

Recently, I wrote that a key thing to working through being hurt is to forgive and forget. This is how God deals with our offenses against Him, therefore we are required to do the same. I assumed this was common knowledge.

But I was wrong! There was no problem with the forgive part, but the forget part seemed to cause quite a stir. I have to admit that this idea of forgiving and forgetting could be confusing. Perhaps I should have touched on the concept of resentment, because that seems to be the problem with understanding the concept of forgetting. When we harbor resentment, it causes harm to ourselves, it does nothing positive or productive, and it keeps us from healing and moving forward.

“But how can I forget what was done to me?” That is what we ask when we are badly hurt. It’s a fair question. But have we ever considered what might be motivating this question? Is it because we want to prevent what hurt us from happening again? Is it because we believe it should not have happened to us? Do we get mad at God because of how unfair it seems? Or is it because we have a “need” to remember it?

All of these motives seem reasonable. But realistically, the pursuit of any one of them is likely to end in disappointment. Wanting to find out the cause and prevent future happenings sounds good and is a noble goal. But doesn’t it to eat away at us as we try to answer the question “Why did you do it?” And why questions are very difficult to get answered in a way that brings peace. Many times the answer is “I don’t know, ”and that can make it worse.

Believing it should not have happened in the first place is a fruitless exercise. First, no one can promise they will never hurt you. Secondly, am I entitled to never be hurt? Is there something so special about me that I get to be excluded from Jesus’ promise of the cross and that those who follow Him would have to go through what He went through? Or is it that we should be entitled to choose our own cross, of which we would definitely exclude being hurt by someone we love as an option?

It’s the last motive that gives me the most reason to pause; namely the “need” to remember the hurt. This is a reality about human beings that we all have to be careful about. Sadly, some people feel better remembering the hurtful things done to them. There is a kind of comfort in revisiting those feelings and recalling the events. What a prison we build for ourselves when we harbor resentment. It’s like listening to the same song over and over, letting yourself feel the pain each time.

And who wins in that scenario? The person who has offended you has likely already forgotten it or does not even realize they did anything “wrong”, either because it was unintentional or because they are chronically abusive. There you are, in a torture chamber, holding someone else responsible for the misery you choose to continue dwelling in. You are the one building your own prison when you keep a hurtful event on a continual loop in your mind.

If there is abuse in the relationship (physical, verbal, psychological), then this is a different story. Abusive relationships are in a class by themselves. Abused people need to be handled with care and more information. Though still called to forgive and forget, but they must also tend to their personal safety and sanity. But being abused does not give license to behave however you like. If you continue to dwell on the horrible things that happened to you, then you are just as broken as you were when you hadn’t the spirit to defend yourself.

Putting abused persons aside, I want to stick with the typical person who is a sinner, who can have normal, healthy relationships, though they have fallen human nature capable of hurting other people. Being hurt in a relationship is part of our journey and helps us become the saints we are called to be.

Because of this fact, we need to expect to be hurt. Christ’s call to forgive “seventy times seven” implies we will be hurt a great deal throughout life. His commandment to “love one another as I have loved you” is the explicit call to live love even when it hurts the most. Jesus’ love for us is not just a forgiving of our sins, but also forgetting them.

We must pause to ask ourselves, “Do I truly know how to forgive as Jesus forgives?”

Take the Gospel scene of Peter, whom Jesus loved (with as real of an affection as any of us have for any person), betraying Jesus in his darkest hour (Peter abandons Him and denies knowing Him three times). Look at how Jesus handles Peter after the Resurrection. Jesus does not make Peter recount what he did, but instead receives him with welcome and draws out Peter’s love with a call to prove his love in service.

Jesus forgets about what Peter did and moves forward in the assumption of Peter’s core love for Him, not Peter’s human weakness capable of betraying him. Peter, in turn, never forgets what he did to the Lord, and strives all his life to make up for it. This is the power of forgiving and forgetting.

So what does it mean to forget?

It does not mean forgetting how it felt to experience an unjust action. It means the ability to face that memory prevent it from having power to influence us in a negative way, whether it be thought, action, or feeling. It is an act of the will, and it does not require the absence of negative memory. How is it possible to make such an act of the will when the memory of feeling that pain still exists?

It’s called the grace of God. God can heal us in very impressive ways if we will let Him. His grace can help anyone rise above what is humanly “normal.”

Therefore if we pray enough, and seek God with great humility, and we act on this desire for God via the sacraments Jesus provided for us in the Catholic Church (particularly Confession and the Holy Eucharist), there is nothing we cannot rise above and or be totally renewed from.

The point is forgiving and forgetting are both supernatural actions, meaning only God can forgive in such a way. We need to develop a deep relationship with Jesus Christ. This is the way we forgive.

Grace does not remove the memory of the injustices of our life. It does something even better. It sanctifies these events, giving us a peace to understand, and a new pair of eyes to see the deeper purpose. Grace overcomes resentment and empowers us to control the memory of feelings. This is the way we forget.

Forgetting what someone did to you does not mean giving someone permission to keep hurting you in the same way. Letting go of the resentment and anger requires detachment from your belief that you are entitled to protection from pain.

Controlling the power feelings of the past have over you and living the grace of God, Who is love itself, is how you forget. Go to Jesus Christ in the Blessed Sacrament for that grace and ability to control the feelings and memories.

 

St. Bernadette’s Lessons in Love

Our Lady of Lourdes and this feast day are special to me. I read an article that was pointing out the fact that St. Bernadette returned to the cave to see “The Lady” again on Valentine’s Day. The article went on to attempt to compare the love Bernadette had for God to the concept of people looking for love.

I’m disappointed in this particular association because Valentine’s Day as we know it had nothing to do with this important appearance of Our Lady. The conclusion of the article was that we are to let love find us instead of trying to find it ourselves, just as St. Bernadette was found by the love of God.

I am all for this concept of love. Let’s all make it a point to love God first and seek Him in ourselves, in others, and all aspects of life. But I don’t see how the love the saints had for God helps those looking for love and marriage. At least not at the practical level.

If we have to search for something about St. Bernadette and the Lourdes apparition that could be of practical help to the concept of human love and relationships, I would suggest we take a look at her circumstances, her character, her vocation, and her posture toward the miraculous waters she discovered.

First, her circumstances. She was born into intense poverty. Her family lived in a one room dwelling that used to be a jail. In this one space, they had a fireplace to use for cooking and a couple of beds. There was absolutely no privacy and no personal possessions. A simple life is an understatement, and it was not a choice. Yet, the six children had their needs met somehow and the family lived gratefully.

Second, her character. Bernadette was described by those who knew her as being of quiet and modest demeanor, with a lively sense of humor and pleasing personality. She did poorly in school and was not very bright. Yet, her gentle way and profound humility won the favor of Heaven enough that Our Lady chose to appear to her. Bernadette herself stated that she was the most ignorant person in the world and that’s why Our Lady must have appeared to her. She was obedient in all things, even when her priest ordered her not to return to the grotto. Though it crushed her deeply, she obeyed. And finally, her patient suffering. The sisters in her convent were cruel to her because of the popularity she enjoyed from the apparition. She was always in a good mood despite the tumor growing on her knee that deformed her leg.

Third, her vocation. After Our Lady stopped appearing to her, she spent several years in school working to graduate. She naturally believed her vocation to be marriage. It was her priest who encouraged her to consider entering the convent, stressing that to have such contact with Heaven was the beginning of a deeper calling, which would be realized in the vocation to the religious life. She was open to it, though not sure she was fit for such a noble life.

Finally, the miraculous waters. She discovered the water which has healed so many others, but she did not partake in them herself. As the movie “The Song of Bernadette” so beautifully portrays, when asked why she does not go to the water to be healed of her tumor, she declared, “the water is not for me.” In other words, she was called to be so closely united to the Lord that her illness was a gift, not something to be taken away.

St. Bernadette is a real woman. She is an inspiration to what it means to be a real person in ordinary circumstances of life and God’s ability to use us if we are available to him. It would be of great value to all single people to consider these aspects of the person of St. Bernadette and her life and follow her example.

Do you have such humility that you accept who you are and all that life deals you, and find joy and peace? Do you have the courage to be yourself and act on what is true regardless of what others might think of you or do to you? Is your demeanor such that you are pleasant to be around? Do you have a good sense of humor? Are you patient, especially in suffering, not making your problems a burden to others, but rather see them as opportunities for union with Christ?

These are sound qualities of a good spouse, as well as a good person. There is much to learn from St. Bernadette that can help anyone seeking to be in love and be married. May she and Our Lady of Lourdes provide you with the assistance to be a quality person and docile instrument of the Lord.

 

Do single men put the toilet seat down?

Picture Dwight Schrute saying, “Question.  Do single men put the toilet seat down?”  That’s a good question, Dwight.

Are toilet seats really the kind of subject matter for polite conversation?   I suppose not.  But I have to say, the toilet seat question is actually a pretty big deal.   Perhaps it shouldn’t be, but for many women, the ability of a man to put the toilet seat down is a courtesy they expect and a sign that he loves her and cares.

Of course, since we are in the restroom, we should also address the replacing the toilet paper issue; namely, the annoying action of just plopping it on top of the holder instead of putting it on the roller.

Guys, do you put the seat down?  And do you put the roll on the roller or just plop it on top?   I honestly don’t remember when I was single if I did these things.  But that’s because I’m a guy, and we really don’t think about such things.

These are not just issues of the married.  If you live at home with your family and have to deal with male siblings or your father, or if you have male visitor to your home, etc., you have crossed this issue.

However, for the married, it can be the kind of issue that triggers larger issues that are outstanding and unresolved, thus being the catalyst for a good fight, typically involving yelling and accusations about what is wrong with the other, with a desire to hopefully (though unrealistically) change the other person.

If it could be caught on camera and viewed by a large audience, it would result in much laughter.  Perhaps a comedian or two have done skits on this.  I’m not sure.  But nothing would compare to seeing it unfold with the actual persons.

It starts with the absurdity the wife feels for the lack of consideration by the husband to leave the toilet seat up, or if the toilet paper remains on top of the roller.   A kind of “last straw” look comes over her face, followed by a storming out of the restroom in pursuit of locating the good-for-nothing husband.  (Keep in mind she has totally abandoned the original purpose for which she has gone into the restroom in the first place, at least for the time being).

Upon locating said good-for-nothing, she asks a why question.  “Why do you insist on leaving that [choice words] toilet seat up?”  Notice the question includes a harsh assumption (i.e. insist), and said in a tone that is out of proportion with the question, as if to really state “This means war!”

I have never quite understood why women consider this to be the best first tactic.  Why ask why?  Do women really think men do this on purpose?   Picture a man going into his lavatory (I love that word) and saying to himself “Now, remember, don’t touch that seat, we really want to get her goat this time,” or “No, don’t put that roll of paper on the roller unless you want her to think you really care.”

I have to believe women know ahead of time there is no answer to that “why?” question.  Most why questions have no answer.  Just walk up to him with a smile, sit him down, take his hand, and say, “Now darling, I love you very much, you know that, but I just want you to know that when you don’t put the seat down it bothers me.”  Perhaps add, in only the gentle, loving way a wife can, “so please put the seat down or I will tear your hair out, my love.  Thank you.”

Will this solve the problem?  Of course not.  Men are dense, and they don’t think.   Does that make us terrible or incapable of marriage?  Not at all.  We are simply slow to learn when it comes to such things.

But if men could learn to put the seat up and to help out by putting the toilet paper on the roller instead of plopping it on top, it would go a long way in many ways.

1)  It will make her happy.  And guys, we do want to make our girl happy, no?
2)  It will NOT go unnoticed.  Women notice these things and they take note.  You will get some major brownie points.
3)  You develop a very good habit.  It not only accomplished the goal, but it also teaches you how to think about little things that don’t exactly matter to you either way.  It will open the door to other thoughtful things around the house you could start doing that otherwise you would not.
4)  You have a nice card to play if and when you get in trouble about some other little thing.  “At least I am putting the seat down, right?”  Having a card like that will always defuse the explosion that is coming at you.

Unfortunately, old habits die hard, so us married men have to endure causing many hardships on our wives and the aftermath of our rude misdemeanors around the house.  But there is hope for the single men who have time now to change their ways.

Single men and women who want to be married should be living their lives as single people developing habits that are conducive and productive for their future married life.    You will avoid many unnecessary disturbances in the home.  But more than that, you will have laid the foundation for becoming a person who will be thoughtful on more important and larger issues that can really make a marriage last and provide a maximum of happiness for the other.

This is a noble goal, to make another person as happy as they can be.  A thoughtful, attentive spouse can make that happen in a big way.  A thoughtless, self-absorbed spouse can make it just the opposite.

So if you want to make a girl happy, get into that habit of putting the seat down and putting the toilet paper on the roller.  Then start finding out other things that really make women smile and feel special, and develop those habits.  When you get married, you will be bringing to the table a lot of good little things that can make a difference.

A final word to the ladies.  I know our frat house ways are disturbing, but do go easy on us.  We are not personally out to get you.  We love you very much and want your happiness.  It’s just that we are men.  And please, please, if your problem is really with the toilet seat, then stick to only the toilet seat issue.  We cannot process an entire lifetime of rude and selfish behaviors thrown at us all at once.  You have a better shot at helping change our ways with a gentle and focused approach.  Otherwise, we will shut down and distance ourselves.

Love is in the little things that say you really noticed what is important to the one you love

Do you love me?

My son’s high school is ambitiously attempting to perform “Fiddler on the Roof” for the school play. In preparation for tryouts, we watched the film as a family. It was the first time for all the kids and they loved it. The story brilliantly shows how the story of love for each couple can vary greatly, but still accomplishes the end goal.

The end goal is a good match of two people who can successfully live out the vocation to marriage. The film is constantly bringing out the question of whether or not the two people are a good match. Those trying to play matchmaker are considering traditional elements of the practical life in marriage, whereas the young people considering their future are concerned with love as their bedrock for marriage.

In my opinion, the most important scene of the story is where the question of love is considered when it comes to the marriage of the parents. “Do you love me?” Tevye asks his wife, Golde. She is shocked by the question and attempts to avoid it. He persists, and she seems disturbed by the pursuit, as if to indicate that it is a dumb question and wants to forget about it and move on with preparations for the Sabbath.

Very, very interesting and observant commentary by the writer to explore this question for this couple married for 25 years and living life the exact same way every day. Are there really couples like this? Can you be married for 25 years and all of a sudden wonder if there is love? The answer is a resounding “yes.” When you have been busy for 25 years raising children, working hard to provide for and run a home, and all the surprises that life brings, you most certainly can have moments where you wonder where your relationship is.

The question of Tevye does not imply that he is worried or has any security issues about his marriage. He is clearly married to this woman, and she is his life just as he is her life. They both know that without question. “Do you love me?” asks if they are still connected; a team; that they “want” to be with each other, not just “have” to; that should there be a disruption in their relationship, both would be affected. Very simply, he wants to know if they both still choose each other, despite their financial condition, any personal faults or weaknesses, and anything the other has said or done.

Golde’s reply and how the couple ends the scene is something I believe most people today would at least secretly say, “There is no way I want that for me. I would rather be alone.” Why? Because Golde finally replies that for 25 years she has lived with him, cooked for him, cleaned for him, struggled in daily life with him, tolerated and put up with him, and raised 5 daughters with him; so she says yes, she loves him. For many people, this is a very unappealing depiction of what marriage is, and would ask “is that all there is?” Sometimes I wonder what Tevye and Golde would say if we could ask them if they would want their relationship to be more than this; if they would like to have those feelings of love they witness in their children’s relationships. I would bet they would say “yes,” but only in a casual way. The fact is, they are used to each other and used to their life. They are also set in their ways.

So they don’t have the blissful feelings of love their daughters have. Maybe they never did. Tevye admits that the first time he saw Golde was on his wedding day. How could they have those feelings? But does that mean they did not love each other for those 25 years? Absolutely not! Their love is real. It might not be ideal, but it is real.

Real marital love is first and foremost practical and with social purpose. God needs marriages for the greatest glorification we human beings can give Him, which is children. Children help form families that establish sound societies in this world, as well as populate Heaven. A very basic purpose for marriage. Add to this the practical element of the mutual help of the man and woman as partners and helpmates to each other. The stability of marital love helps the individual person live in peace and purpose.

Tevye and Golde lived this. They were committed to this purpose, along with the other ends of marriage, which are fidelity and permanence. They accepted their life together. They were not people who grew up with the concept of affectionate love, therefore were probably not comfortable with displaying their love in that way.

If blissful feelings accompany the practical elements of marital love, then all the better. But feelings come and go, and sometimes die. But true love does not. Am I against feelings and prioritizing feelings when it comes to discovering love? No. I think the feelings of being in love are like no other feelings. What I am saying is that the practical elements of marital love are a higher priority than the feelings. Knowing what true marital love is and requires, and action on that knowledge is much more important than feeling love and acting only if the feelings are there.

“Fiddler on the Roof” provides us with an insightful look at what true love is. Feelings of love do play an important role in drawing us into the mystery of love between a man and woman, but can deceive us just enough to lead us away from certain truths and realities if we are not careful.

Anyone can have a good, happy, loving marriage even if there are not the fireworks feelings that one or both might desire, as long as there is a mutual acceptance of what they have and a commitment to that reality. It might not be the ideal, but then again, what married couple is living the ideal? Living the vocation of marriage is not about the ideal, it is about the practical.

In fact, the lesson of the love that Jesus Christ has for us is that it is precisely when we do not have a good, warm, fuzzy feeling that the actions of love are proven. The security that marital love requires comes not from the ever fluctuating feelings of love, but from the steady living out of daily mutual self-donation. Our feelings of joy come from serving God in our vocation and the certitude of knowing we are where we are meant to be. God willing, the person you marry feels the same way and lives it. Then marriage is the best thing in the world.

Praise be to God for the romantic feelings that accompany the demands of unconditional marital love; may they remain always with a couple. But should they diminish or die, may God help us to realize that love is still there and to continue carrying out the mission of love.

 

Key Ingredients of Love and Marriage That Lasts

I just came across this obituary of a married Catholic couple, Lou and Patricia DeMuro, who died on the same day after 62 years of marriage. It’s a real old-fashioned love story.

It is a very touching story. The simplicity in which this couple approached life and each other is inspiring. Their contentment with what life offered them admirable. This couple’s story should be what every person should be looking for when it comes to love and marriage. They offer two key ingredients to falling in love and a successful marriage; approaching life with simplicity and contentment.

Sadly, too many people complicate the process and get too demanding when it comes to their expectations of another person, making it almost impossible to find such love. The more qualifications necessary, the less likely to find happiness and share such a life.

It’s also important to realize that they had very humble beginnings and lived a humble life. They were not angry or frustrated about their financial situation. They were accepting of it, made do, and were thankful for their blessings. They were also very young. That helps too. When you marry young, it gives you more years together. And the more years you have living together in marriage, the less selfish you become.

But this couple have more to teach us about approaching love and marriage. They had an earnest desire to make each other happy and feel special. They did not take each other for granted. Let’s see how the reporter described their life from the research:

  • Their life together had few frills but many laughs.
  • They would sing the 1950s hit “How Much is That Doggie in the Window?”. They listened to the soundtracks from “South Pacific” and “Mary Poppins” hundreds of times. The louder their kids sang along, the more the DeMuros smiled.
  • They were a tag team when it came to raising their three kids. When Mr. DeMuro got home from work, he was a hands-on parent, so Patricia DeMuro could head to her night job.
  • They did everything together.
  • They lived in a two-flat with relatives upstairs.
  • The children went to school across the street at Our Lady Help of Christians. They’d come home for lunch.
  • When the family moved in 1968, Mrs. DeMuro brushed up her secretarial skills and landed a job at AT&T. Mr. DeMuro was an order filler for Motorola and worked at a cutlery firm.
  • They would take bus tours and cruises to Alaska and the Caribbean, along the Mississippi River and through the Panama Canal.
  • They loved going to Massachusetts in the fall to watch the leaves change colors.

Laughed a lot, basic living, enjoyed their kids (loud kids made them smile!), sang corny songs, made home-made sausage, hands-on parenting as a team, living with relatives in the same house, kids went to Catholic school, she worked to help bring in money, he worked two jobs, simple pleasures. They did everything together.

Now let’s see how their kids describe them and their life with their parents:

  • They remember Dad barbecuing and getting the biggest kick out of watching the kids play.
  • The homemade sausage was so good, it spoiled them for anything else.
  • Their parents roller-skated, bowled and played pinochle together and even used his-and-hers lawnmowers to mow their grass side-by-side.
  • Mom was really in tune with their schoolwork. She was there all the time. She slept while they were at school.
  • Sundays meant pot roast for dinner.
  • They were always asking them ‘How ya doing? Are you OK?’ Always checking up on them. They were encouraging.
  • Dad enjoyed taking his sons golfing at Salt Creek Country Club in Itasca.
  • The family liked hitting Wood Dale Bowl and watching Clint Eastwood spaghetti Westerns at the old Thunderbird Theater in Hoffman Estates.
  • Dad would do the shopping and mom the cooking, making homemade ravioli, manicotti, pizza, pineapple upside-down cake and Italian cookies.

Togetherness, availability, genuine interest, hard-working, tender moments, frugality, attentiveness to the children’s needs.

What stands out to me is how happy they were, and more importantly, how happy the children were. Their children felt they had a rich life growing up. They certainly were not poor. Pot roast on Sunday is very middle class. They were careful with their money. And I’m sure they were “savers” and had money due to their being careful with their money and not reckless. They lived within their means, but still did special things. It was not a life of extravagance.

Another thing that stands out to me is that the things the children point out are all have to do with how the couple interacted together at a friendship level. It does not seem that either one dominated the other. The mutual respect seems to be what the children took from their relationship.

It really goes to show that bonding as friends with a mutual respect of each other is a key ingredient to success in marriage. Each person is free to be themselves, yet has a desire to do things together and be together. Seeking someone you can have that kind of bond with goes so far beyond age differences, physical attraction, child-bearing requirements, and the many kinds of things single people allow themselves to get so caught up in.

And this couple took the plunge. They saw in each other someone they wanted to be with; a suitable partner. They did not question it or ponder too deeply about if this is the one God had in mind. They did not reject the other in hopes of finding someone better. They probably gave it no thought at all. Since they were both people who approached life with simplicity and were not hard people to please, they knew how to be content and appreciate what they had. I’m sure this prepared them well for finding the kind of love in another person.

On her deathbed, Mr. DeMuro was brought in to see Mrs. DeMuro. He said “Hi Babe,” and she said “Lou, I love you. I had a wonderful life. I’ll see you in another place.” They lived in such close union with each other in that bond of love. So it was fitting that, at the end, they died together, succumbing within hours of each other from a multitude of ailments. Lou had leukemia, Parkinson’s disease and was in hospice. Patricia had diabetes, high blood pressure and heart failure. In the end, they both needed others to care for them. But their desire was always to take care of the other, especially each other’s hearts.

It is not dumb luck or a fluke that they cherished each other for 62 years and still felt so close after all that time. They gave themselves completely to the other, and wanted to, and found joy in it. If we all would approach life with simplicity and as content people, without over expectations and qualifications about the people who come along and whom we date, we just might end up with a life of love as Lou and Patricia DeMuro shared.